...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Evidence-based medicine training in undergraduate medical education: A review and critique of the literature published 2006-2011
【24h】

Evidence-based medicine training in undergraduate medical education: A review and critique of the literature published 2006-2011

机译:本科医学教育中的循证医学培训:2006-2011年文献回顾与批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To characterize recent evidence-based medicine (EBM) educational interventions for medical students and suggest future directions for EBM education. METHOD: The authors searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, Educational Resource Information Center, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases for English-language articles published between 2006 and 2011 that featured medical students and interventions addressing multiple EBM skills. They extracted data on learner and instructor characteristics, educational settings, teaching methods, and EBM skills covered. RESULTS: The 20 included articles described interventions delivered in 12 countries in classroom (75%), clinic (25%), and/or online (20%) environments. The majority (60%) focused on clinical students, whereas 30% targeted preclinical students and 10% included both. EBM skills addressed included recognizing a knowledge gap (20%), asking a clinical question (90%), searching for information (90%), appraising information (85%), applying information (65%), and evaluating practice change (5%). Physicians were most often identified as instructors (60%); co-teachers included librarians (20%), allied health professionals (10%), and faculty from other disciplines (10%). Many studies (60%) included interventions at multiple points during one year, but none were longitudinal across students' tenures. Teaching methods varied. Intervention efficacy could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Settings, learner levels and instructors, teaching methods, and covered skills differed across interventions. Authors writing about EBM interventions should include detailed descriptions and employ more rigorous research methods to allow others to draw conclusions about efficacy. When designing EBM interventions, educators should consider trends in medical education (e.g., online learning, interprofessional education) and in health care (e.g., patient-centered care, electronic health records).
机译:目的:表征针对医学生的最新循证医学(EBM)教育干预措施,并提出EBM教育的未来方向。方法:作者在MEDLINE,Scopus,教育资源信息中心和循证医学评论数据库中搜索了2006年至2011年之间发表的英语文章,这些文章重点介绍了医学生和应对多种EBM技能的干预措施。他们提取了有关学习者和教师的特征,教育背景,教学方法和EBM技能的数据。结果:包含20篇文章描述了在教室(75%),诊所(25%)和/或在线(20%)环境中在12个国家/地区提供的干预措施。大多数(60%)面向临床学生,而30%面向临床前学生,而10%包括两者。解决的EBM技能包括认识知识差距(20%),提出临床问题(90%),搜索信息(90%),评估信息(85%),应用信息(65%)以及评估实践改变(5 %)。最常被确定为内科医生的医生(60%);联合老师包括图书馆员(20%),专职卫生专业人员(10%)和其他学科的教师(10%)。许多研究(60%)包括一年中多个时间点的干预,但是没有一个是跨学生任期的纵向干预。教学方法多种多样。无法确定干预效果。结论:设置,学习者水平和指导者,教学方法和涵盖技能因干预而异。有关循证医学干预措施的作者应包括详细的描述,并采用更严格的研究方法,以使其他人得出有关疗效的结论。在设计EBM干预措施时,教育工作者应考虑医学教育(例如在线学习,专业间教育)和卫生保健(例如以患者为中心的护理,电子健康记录)的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号