首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Longitudinal research databases in medical education: facilitating the study of educational outcomes over time and across institutions.
【24h】

Longitudinal research databases in medical education: facilitating the study of educational outcomes over time and across institutions.

机译:医学教育中的纵向研究数据库:促进随着时间和跨机构研究教育成果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many education research questions cannot be answered using participants from one institution or short periods of follow-up. In response to societal demands for accountability and evidence of effectiveness, new models of research must be developed to study the outcomes of educational activities. Following the 2007 Millennium Conference on Medical Education Research, organizers assigned a task force to explore the use of longitudinal databases in education research. This article summarizes the task force's findings. Similar to the Framingham studies in clinical medicine, longitudinal databases assemble prospectively collected information to retrospectively answer questions of interest. Many studies using such databases have been published. The task force identified three general approaches to database-type research. First, institutions can obtain identified information from existing sources, link it with school-specific information and other identified information, deidentify it, and merge it with similar information from other collaborating schools. Second, researchers can obtain from existing sources deidentified information on large samples and explore associations within this dataset. Third, investigators can design and implement databases to prospectively collect trainee information over time and across multiple institutions for the purpose of education research. Although costly, such comprehensive, purpose-built databases would ensure the availability of information needed to answer a variety of medical education research questions. Millennium Conference participants believed that stakeholders should explore the funding and development of such prospective databases. In the meantime, education researchers should use existing sources of individualized learner data to better understand how to develop competent, compassionate clinicians.
机译:许多教育研究问题无法使用来自一个机构的参与者或短期的随访来回答。为了响应社会对问责制和有效性证据的需求,必须开发新的研究模型来研究教育活动的成果。在2007年千年医学教育研究会议之后,组织者指派了一个工作组来研究纵向数据库在教育研究中的使用。本文总结了工作组的发现。类似于弗雷明汉(Framingham)在临床医学中的研究,纵向数据库收集前瞻性收集的信息,以追溯性地回答感兴趣的问题。使用这种数据库的许多研究已经发表。工作队确定了三种用于数据库类型研究的通用方法。首先,机构可以从现有资源中获取已识别的信息,将其与特定于学校的信息和其他已识别的信息链接起来,对它们进行识别,然后将其与其他合作学校的类似信息合并。其次,研究人员可以从现有资源中获取有关大样本的身份信息,并探索该数据集中的关联。第三,研究人员可以设计和实施数据库,以期在一段时间内跨多个机构前瞻性地收集学员信息,以进行教育研究。尽管成本高昂,但这种全面的,专门构建的数据库将确保回答各种医学教育研究问题所需的信息的可用性。千年会议的与会者认为,利益攸关方应探索此类前瞻性数据库的资金和开发。同时,教育研究人员应使用现有的个性化学习者数据来源,以更好地了解如何培养有能力,富有同情心的临床医生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号