...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Accrual and recruitment practices at Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Institutions: A call for expectations, expertise, and evaluation
【24h】

Accrual and recruitment practices at Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Institutions: A call for expectations, expertise, and evaluation

机译:临床和转化科学奖(CTSA)机构的应聘和招聘实践:要求期望,专业知识和评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To respond to increased public and programmatic demand to address underenrollment of clinical translational research studies, the authors examined participant recruitment practices at Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) sites and make recommendations for performance metrics and accountability. Method: The CTSA Recruitment and Retention taskforce in 2010 invited representatives at 46 CTSAs to complete an online 48-question survey querying accrual and recruitment outcomes, practices, evaluation methods, policies, and perceived gaps in related knowledge/practice. Descriptive statistical and thematic analyses were conducted. Results: Forty-six respondents representing 44 CTSAs completed the survey. Recruitment conducted by study teams was the most common practice reported (78%-91%, by study type); 39% reported their institution offered recruitment services to investigators. Respondents valued study feasibility assessment as a successful practice (39%); desired additional resources included feasibility assessments (49%) and participant registries (44%). None reported their institution systematically required justification of feasibility; some indicated relevant information was considered prior to institutional review board (IRB) review (30%) or contract approval (22%). All respondents' IRBs tracked study progress, but only 10% of respondents could report outcome data for timely accrual. Few reported written policies addressing poor accrual or provided data to support recruitment practice effectiveness. Conclusions: Many CTSAs lack the necessary frame work to support study accrual. Recom men dations to enhance accrual include articulating institutional expectations and policy for routine recruitment plan ning; providing recruitment expertise to inform feasibility assessment and recruit ment planning; and developing interdepartmental coordination and integrated informatics infrastructure to drive the conduct, evaluation, and improvement of recruitment practices.
机译:目的:为了应对日益增加的公共和计划需求,以解决临床转化研究研究的不足招募问题,作者在“临床和转化科学奖”(CTSA)网站上研究了参与者的招募实践,并提出了绩效指标和问责制的建议。方法:2010年CTSA招聘和保留工作组邀请了46个CTSA的代表完成了一个在线48问题调查,查询了应计和招聘结果,实践,评估方法,政策以及相关知识/实践中的可感知差距。进行描述性统计和主题分析。结果:代表44个CTSA的46位受访者完成了调查。研究小组进行的招聘是最常见的做法(按研究类型,占78%-91%); 39%的人报告说他们的机构向调查人员提供了招聘服务。受访者认为研究可行性评估是成功的做法(39%);所需的额外资源包括可行性评估(49%)和参与者注册表(44%)。没有人报告他们的机构系统地要求可行性的证明;在机构审查委员会(IRB)审查(30%)或合同批准(22%)之前,已考虑了一些指示的相关信息。所有受访者的IRB都跟踪研究进度,但是只有10%的受访者可以报告结果数据以便及时获得。很少有报告的书面政策解决应计额差或提供数据来支持招聘实践有效性的问题。结论:许多CTSA缺乏支持研究应计的必要框架。为提高应计收入而提出的建议包括阐明机构期望和常规招聘计划政策;提供招聘专业知识,以指导可行性评估和招聘计划;发展部门间的协调和集成的信息学基础架构,以推动行为,评估和改善招聘实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号