首页> 外文期刊>BioSocieties >Neuromarketing in the making: Enactment and reflexive entanglement in an emerging field
【24h】

Neuromarketing in the making: Enactment and reflexive entanglement in an emerging field

机译:正在做的神经营销:新兴领域的制定和反思性纠缠

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the neurosciences make their way beyond the laboratory, they become influential in a wide range of domains. How to understand this process? What are the prospects for, and dynamics of, influence, uptake and rejection? This article reports our attempts to track the emergence of neurosciences with particular reference to the emergence of the field of neuromarketing. Our key initial tasks included the identification and definition of the field, the negotiation of access, and establishing relations with participants and informants. These tasks gave rise to what are often construed as familiar 'methodological difficulties', such as how to define the field and what to make of the reactions and responses of those involved in neuromarketing. In this article we present some of our experiences of researching the empirical materials of neuromarketing to assess different responses to 'methodological difficulties' in studying science and technologies in the making. We draw on analytic resources provided by Science and Technology Studies to address the challenge of studying emerging fields of science, practices and technologies. In particular, we draw on the concepts of multiplicity, performativity and practical ontology to argue that a particular approach to 'methodological difficulties' can actually enrich our research objectives. We suggest that reflexivity be understood, not predominantly as a methodological corrective to the problems of detecting an antecedent object of research; but as revealing some of the ways in which neuromarketing is enacted.
机译:随着神经科学超越实验室,它们在许多领域都具有影响力。如何理解这个过程?影响,吸收和排斥的前景和动态如何?本文报告了我们跟踪神经科学兴起的尝试,特别是参考了神经营销领域的兴起。我们的主要初始任务包括该领域的标识和定义,访问的协商以及与参与者和线人的关系建立。这些任务引起了通常被认为是熟悉的“方法论难题”,例如如何定义领域以及如何对涉及神经营销人员的反应作出反应。在本文中,我们介绍了一些研究神经营销经验材料的经验,以评估在研究制造科学和技术时对“方法论难题”的不同反应。我们利用科学技术研究提供的分析资源来应对研究新兴科学,实践和技术领域的挑战。特别是,我们利用多样性,性能和实践本体的概念来论证,解决“方法论难题”的特定方法实际上可以丰富我们的研究目标。我们建议,应将自反性理解为,而不主要是作为一种方法学上的纠正,以发现问题的先验研究对象。却揭示了进行神经营销的一些方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号