首页> 外文期刊>Abdominal imaging. >Diagnosis of benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: color Doppler US, contrast-enhanced US, and fine-needle biopsy.
【24h】

Diagnosis of benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: color Doppler US, contrast-enhanced US, and fine-needle biopsy.

机译:对肝硬化肝细胞癌患者的良性和恶性门静脉血栓的诊断:彩色多普勒超声,对比增强超声和细针穿刺活检。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: We assessed the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis in patients who had cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients who had cirrhosis, biopsy-proved HCC, and thrombosis of the main portal vein and/or left/right portal vein on US were prospectively studied with color Doppler US (CDUS) and CEUS. CEUS was performed at low mechanical index after intravenous administration of a second-generation contrast agent (SonoVue, Bracco, Milan, Italy). Presence or absence of CDUS signals or thrombus enhancement on CEUS were considered diagnostic for malignant or benign portal vein thrombosis. Twenty-eight patients also underwent percutaneous portal vein fine-needle biopsy (FNB) under US guidance. All patients were followed-up bimonthly by CDUS. Shrinkage of the thrombus and/or recanalization of the vessels on CDUS during follow-up were considered definitive evidence of the benign nature of the thrombosis, whereas enlargement of the thrombus, disruption of the vessel wall, and parenchymal infiltration over follow-up were considered consistent with malignancy. CDUS, CEUS, and FNB results were compared with those at follow-up. RESULTS: Follow-up (4 to 21 months) showed signs of malignant thrombosis in 34 of 54 patients. FNB produced a true-positive result for malignancy in 19 of 25 patients, a false-negative result in six of 25 patients, and a true-negative result in three of three patients. CDUS was positive in seven of 54 patients. CEUS showed enhancement of the thrombus in 30 of 54 patients. No false-positive result was observed at CDUS, CEUS, and FNB. Sensitivities of CDUS, CEUS, and FNB in detecting malignant thrombi were 20%, 88%, and 76% respectively. Three patients showed negative CDUS and CEUS and positive FNB results; follow-up confirmed malignant thrombosis in these patients. One patient showed negative CDUS, CEUS, and FNB findings. Howewer, follow-up of the thrombus showed US signs of malignancy. Another FNB confirmed HCC infiltration of the portal vein. CONCLUSION: CEUS seems to be the most sensitive and specific test for diagnosing malignant portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.
机译:背景:我们评估了超声造影(CEUS)在肝硬化肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中良性和恶性门静脉血栓形成的鉴别诊断中的作用。方法:使用彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)和CEUS对54例连续性肝硬化,活检证实的HCC和主门静脉和/或左/右门静脉血栓形成的患者进行了前瞻性研究。静脉内注射第二代造影剂(SonoVue,Bracco,米兰,意大利)后,CEUS在低机械指数下进行。 CEUS上是否存在CDUS信号或血栓增强被认为可诊断出恶性或良性门静脉血栓。在美国的指导下,二十八名患者也接受了经皮门静脉细针活检(FNB)。所有患者每两个月接受CDUS随访。随访期间,CDUS上的血栓缩小和/或血管再通被认为是血栓形成的良性性质的明确证据,而在随访期间血栓扩大,血管壁破裂和实质浸润被认为是确定的证据。与恶性肿瘤一致。将CDUS,CEUS和FNB结果与随访结果进行比较。结果:随访(4到21个月)显示54例患者中有34例恶性血栓形成。 FNB在25例患者中有19例恶性肿瘤为阳性,在25例患者中有6例为阴性,三例患者中有3例为阴性。 54例患者中有7例CDUS阳性。 CEUS在54例患者中有30例显示血栓增强。在CDUS,CEUS和FNB上未观察到假阳性结果。 CDUS,CEUS和FNB检测恶性血栓的敏感性分别为20%,88%和76%。 3例CDUS和CEUS阴性,FNB结果阳性。随访证实了这些患者的恶性血栓形成。一名患者显示CDUS,CEUS和FNB阴性。但是,对血栓的随访显示出美国出现恶性肿瘤的迹象。另一个FNB证实HCC渗入门静脉。结论:CEUS似乎是诊断肝硬化患者恶性门静脉血栓形成的最敏感,最特异性的检查方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号