...
首页> 外文期刊>AAPG Bulletin >Measuring what we think we have found:Advantages of probabilistic over deterministic methods for estimating oil and gas reserves and resources in exploration and production
【24h】

Measuring what we think we have found:Advantages of probabilistic over deterministic methods for estimating oil and gas reserves and resources in exploration and production

机译:评估我们认为已发现的东西:概率论和确定性方法在勘探和生产中估算油气储量和资源的优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Proved reserves is the class of crude oil and natural gas resources in whose recovery we have high confidence.Investors,bankers,governments,and the media perceive proved reserves as the basic assets of petroleum exploration and production (E&P)companies,and downward revisions of proved reserves,especially if they are unanticipated,negatively impact the value of such firms.Many reserves write-downs stem directly or indirectly from a long-standing,fundamental flaw in the definition of proved reserves as an estimate of future production that the estimator is reasonably certain will be achieved or exceeded.However,because no specific confidence level (= probability)is specified for reasonable certainty,and different estimators and companies have different standards,proved reserves is an inconsistent metric,so estimators cannot be accountable.This basic unaccountability taints the entire field of reserves estimating.The proved-reserves issue is only one aspect of a larger conceptual and procedural problem in petroleum E&P:how to best measure and express the uncertain quantities of oil and gas thought to be recoverable from wells,properties,fields,prospects,and plays owned by E&P companies.Traditional methods are deterministic,where single-number estimates represent uncertain future production volumes or segments of variously uncertain future oil or gas recoveries (proved,probable,and possible).Probabilistic methods,where ranges of possible recoverable volumes are associated with their perceived likelihood,have,by now,been widely embraced by the exploration part of E&P,whereas the production/development arm of the industry has been slow to surrender the use of determinism.Considering six clear advantages of the probabilistic approach,it may be difficult to understand why determinism persists,but there are pragmatic reasons why some segments of E&P,the accounting profession,the banking and financial community,news media,and governmental regulators and administrators prefer to use deterministic values.Joint technical committees of the leading professional E&P societies are currently addressing these issues in the hope of achieving an improved,more uniform approach.
机译:探明储量是对原油和天然气资源具有高度信心的一类,我们对其信心十足。投资者,银行家,政府和媒体将探明储量视为石油勘探与生产(E&P)公司的基本资产,并向下修订探明储量,特别是如果未预料到的话,会对这些公司的价值产生负面影响。许多储量减值直接或间接源于探明储量定义中长期存在的根本性缺陷,该缺陷是对估计量的未来产量的估计。但是,由于没有为合理的确定性指定特定的置信度(=概率),并且不同的估算者和公司具有不同的标准,因此,探明储量是不一致的指标,因此估算者无法承担责任。探明储量问题只是更大的概念和实践的一个方面石油勘探与开发中的程序性问题:如何最好地衡量和表达被认为可从勘探与开发公司拥有的井,物产,田地,前景和油气田中采出的不确定量的油气。传统方法是确定性的,其中单数估计代表不确定的未来产量或分段确定的各种不确定的未来油气回收量(已探明,可能和可能)。勘探方法已广泛采用概率方法,其中可能的可采量范围与它们的感知可能性相关。鉴于E&P的一部分,该行业的生产/开发部门对确定性使用的迟缓。考虑到概率方法的六个明显优点,可能很难理解为什么确定性仍然存在,但是有一些实用的原因E&P,会计专业,银行和金融界,新闻媒体以及政府监管机构和管理人员的首选领先的勘探与生产协会的联合技术委员会目前正在着手解决这些问题,以期寻求一种改进,更统一的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号