首页> 外文期刊>Accreditation and quality assurance >Comparison of exact matching and calibration curve quantification methods for glucose in human serum GC-IDMS analysis and their application for the development of certified reference materials
【24h】

Comparison of exact matching and calibration curve quantification methods for glucose in human serum GC-IDMS analysis and their application for the development of certified reference materials

机译:人体血清GC-IDMS分析中葡萄糖的精确匹配和校准曲线定量方法的比较及其在认证参考物质开发中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The establishment of a precise and accurate method for the determination of the analyte is the first step in the development of certified reference materials (CRMs), which play a key role in metrological traceability. To assist the production of a glucose CRM in human serum for clinical chemistry routine tests, we developed a gas chromatography-isotope dilution mass spectrometry method using trimethylsilylation and performed two calibration techniques: exact matching approach and calibration curve. Performance of the method and calibration techniques were evaluated for their suitability for the characterization of a CRM candidate carrying out studies to assign the property value and to assure homogeneity as well as short- and long-term stability. Both calibration approaches were equivalent in terms of accuracy and precision and presented bias lower than 1.0 % with relative standard deviations lower than 3.0 %. Relative measurement uncertainties obtained with the exact matching approach calibration method were between 1.0 % and 2.5 % and were lower than the ones obtained with calibration curve method. This finding justifies the use of the time-consuming exact matching method for the assignment of the property value, while the calibration curve procedure suits the other certification studies.
机译:建立精确,准确的分析物测定方法是开发认证参考材料(CRM)的第一步,该参考材料在计量可追溯性中起着关键作用。为了协助在人血清中生产葡萄糖CRM用于临床化学常规测试,我们开发了一种使用三甲基甲硅烷基化的气相色谱-同位素稀释质谱法,并执行了两种校准技术:精确匹配法和校准曲线。对方法和校准技术的性能进行了评估,以评估其是否适合表征CRM候选者,并进行研究以分配属性值并确保均一性以及短期和长期稳定性。两种校准方法在精度和精确度方面都是等效的,并且偏差低于1.0%,相对标准偏差低于3.0%。精确匹配法校准方法获得的相对测量不确定度在1.0%至2.5%之间,低于校准曲线方法获得的不确定度。这一发现证明了使用费时的精确匹配方法来分配属性值是合理的,而校准曲线程序适合其他认证研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号