...
首页> 外文期刊>ACJ(American Chianina Journal) >Carcass Ultrasound 101: Ultrasound vs. DMA Testing: Carcass Tools, Not Choices
【24h】

Carcass Ultrasound 101: Ultrasound vs. DMA Testing: Carcass Tools, Not Choices

机译:cas体超声101:超声与DMA测试:Car体工具,不是选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

At first glance, it might seem impossible for a person entrenched in ultrasound to publish any article about DNA testing without sounding biased toward ultrasound. Breeders often consider the two technologies as bitter rivals fighting for the same prize. However, a more in-depth look at each carcass tool reveals that ultrasound and DNA rarely compete directly with one another. Each technology can be aimed at the same genetic "question," but give entirely different "answers." Breeders and bull buyersalike need to be aware of what the results mean, not just what they say. In some cases, breeders may be spending money on technology for information their customers don't want, and buyers may be placing unneeded emphasis on a trait that is not adding totheir bottom line. Contrary to what some may believe, carcass ultrasound and current DNA technology can be harnessed together to assess the true genetic value of beef cattle.
机译:乍看之下,对于一个深深扎根于超声的人来说,发表任何有关DNA测试的文章似乎听起来似乎并没有偏向于超声,这似乎是不可能的。育种者经常将这两种技术视为争夺同一奖项的激烈竞争者。但是,更深入地研究每种屠体工具表明,超声波和DNA很少直接相互竞争。每种技术都可以针对相同的遗传“问题”,但却给出完全不同的“答案”。育种者和公牛购买者都需要知道结果的含义,而不仅仅是他们所说的。在某些情况下,育种者可能会花钱在技术上,以获取客户不想要的信息,而购买者可能会不必要地强调不会增加其底线的性状。与某些人所认为的相反,可以将ultrasound体超声和当前的DNA技术结合起来评估肉牛的真实遗传价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号