...
首页> 外文期刊>癌と化学療法 >Cost-effectiveness analysis of maximum androgen blockade for Japanese men with advanced prostate cancer
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of maximum androgen blockade for Japanese men with advanced prostate cancer

机译:晚期前列腺癌的日本男性最大雄激素封闭成本分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Like other countries, Japan is facing the problem of rising medical costs associated with aging of the population, and therefore the cost-effectiveness of medicines has become increasingly important. Maximum androgen blockade (MAB) therapy, which is being widely used for advanced prostate cancer, has proved useful in clinical studies but it requires the additional use of an anti-androgen in contrast with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa) monotherapy, raising a concern about the increase medical costs. Thus, based on the results of a Japanese Phase III study of bicalutamide we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis. We constructed a Markov model to express the changes in prognosis following MAB therapy and LHRHa monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer and the cost and effectiveness (survival) were simulated. As a result, the expected costs of MAB therapy and LHRHa monotherapy were 5,240,000 yen and 3,660,000 yen, respectively, with expected survival durations of 7.45 and 6.44 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for MAB therapy was 1,560,000 yen/life-year saved, lower than the established threshold (6,000,000 yen/life-year saved), and a sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of this result. Therefore, the incremental cost of bicalutamide was considered worth it in view of the therapeutic effect, suggesting that MAB therapy is a highly cost-effective therapy.
机译:与其他国家一样,日本正面临着与人口老龄化相关的医疗成本上升的问题,因此药物的成本效益变得越来越重要。在临床研究中证明,最大用于晚期前列腺癌的最大雄激素阻断(MAB)治疗,但它需要额外使用抗雄激素与培氏素激素释放激素激动剂(LHRHA)单一疗法相比,饲养抗雄激素关注增加医疗费用。因此,基于日语III研究的基于Bicalutamide的研究,我们进行了成本效益分析。我们构建了一款马尔可夫模型,表达MAB治疗后预后的变化,并模拟了晚期前列腺癌的LHRHA单药治疗,并模拟了成本和有效性(存活率)。因此,MAB治疗和LHRHA单疗法的预期成本分别为5,240,000日元,分别为3,660,000日元,预期存活持续时间为7.45和6.44岁。 MAB疗法的增量成本效益比为1,560,000日元/救生年度,低于既定的阈值(保存6,000,000日元/救生年度),敏感性分析证实了这一结果的稳健性。因此,考虑到治疗效果,认为,鉴于治疗疗法是一种高度成本效益的治疗,认为基本丁胺的增量成本是值得的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号