首页> 外文期刊>Current Protein and Peptide Science >A Sampling-Based Method for Ranking Protein Structural Models by Integrating Multiple Scores and Features
【24h】

A Sampling-Based Method for Ranking Protein Structural Models by Integrating Multiple Scores and Features

机译:通过集成多个得分和特征的基于抽样的蛋白质结构模型排名方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

One of the major challenges in protein tertiary structure prediction is structure quality assessment. In many cases, protein structure prediction tools generate good structural models, but fail to select the best models from a huge number of candidates as the final output. In this study, we developed a sampling-based machine-learning method to rank protein structural models by integrating multiple scores and features. First, features such as predicted secondary structure, solvent accessibility and residue-residue contact information are integrated by two Radial Basis Function (RBF) models trained from different datasets. Then, the two RBF scores and five selected scoring functions developed by others, i.e., Opus-CA, Opus-PSP, DFIRE, RAPDF, and Cheng Score are synthesized by a sampling method. At last, another integrated RBF model ranks the structural models according to the features of sampling distribution. We tested the proposed method by using two different datasets, including the CASP server prediction models of all CASP8 targets and a set of models generated by our in-house software MUFOLD. The test result shows that our method outperforms any individual scoring function on both best model selection, and overall correlation between the predicted ranking and the actual ranking of structural quality.
机译:蛋白质三级结构预测中的主要挑战之一是结构质量评估。在许多情况下,蛋白质结构预测工具会生成良好的结构模型,但无法从大量候选对象中选择最佳模型作为最终输出。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种基于采样的机器学习方法,通过整合多个得分和特征来对蛋白质结构模型进行排名。首先,通过从不同数据集中训练的两个径向基函数(RBF)模型集成了诸如预测的二级结构,溶剂可及性和残渣-残渣接触信息等功能。然后,通过采样方法合成两个RBF得分和其他人开发的五个选定的得分函数,即Opus-CA,Opus-PSP,DFIRE,RAPDF和Cheng得分。最后,另一个集成的RBF模型根据采样分布的特征对结构模型进行排序。我们通过使用两个不同的数据集(包括所有CASP8目标的CASP服务器预测模型以及由我们的内部软件MUFOLD生成的一组模型)测试了该方法。测试结果表明,我们的方法在最佳模型选择以及结构质量的预测等级与实际等级之间的总体相关性方面均优于任何单独的评分功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号