首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair surveillance may not be necessary for the first 3 years after an initially normal duplex postoperative study
【24h】

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair surveillance may not be necessary for the first 3 years after an initially normal duplex postoperative study

机译:最初正常正常的双链运动术后研究后的前3年可能在血管内主动脉瘤修复监测可能不是必要的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: We have previously shown that duplex ultrasonography (DU) may replace computed tomography angiography (CTA) as the primary surveillance tool for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Current Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines suggest that if CTA does not document endoleak, aneurysm sac enlargement, or limb stenosis by 12 months after EVAR, surveillance studies may be performed annually. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the time to the second surveillance DU study can be safely postponed to 3 years after EVAR if the initial study finding is normal. Methods: Between 1998 and 2013, DU surveillance was performed in our accredited noninvasive vascular laboratory at 1 week, 6 months, and annually after 410 EVARs (follow-up: mean, 35 months; range, 0.5-151 months). DU was used to measure sac diameter, intrasac endoleak peak systolic velocities (PSVs), and PSVs within endograft limbs. If an endoleak, limb stenosis, or increase in sac size was documented, DU surveillance was performed more frequently or CTA was performed, followed by intervention if appropriate. Results: On the basis of DU surveillance, 113 patients (28%) were diagnosed with either endoleak or graft limb stenosis during the follow-up period. There were 95 patients (23%) with 118 endoleaks (15 [13%] type I, 90 [76%] type II, 11 [9%] type III, 2 [2%] type IV). There were 18 (4%) patients with limb stenosis defined as PSV >300 cm/s. Intervention was performed in 32 (28%) of the 113 patients with endoleak or limb stenosis, or in 8% of the total group (32 of 410), during the follow-up period of 0.5 to 151 months. Only 2.2% of the patients (7 of 325) with an initially normal finding on post-EVAR DU went on to develop endoleak or limb stenosis that required intervention during 3-year follow-up compared with 25% of patients (21 of 85) with an initially abnormal finding on post-EVAR DU (P =.0001). Conclusions: These findings suggest that follow-up DU surveillance can be postponed until 3 years after EVAR if the initial result of surveillance DU is normal (no endoleak, sac enlargement, stenosis), with minimal risk of an adverse clinical event.
机译:目的:我们之前已经表明,双工超声(DU)可以将计算机断层造影(CTA)替换为血管内主动脉动脉瘤修复的主要监测工具(EVAR)。目前的血管外科练习协会表明,如果CTA在EVAR后12个月内没有记录鼻塞,动脉瘤SAC扩大或肢体狭窄,则可以每年进行监测研究。本研究的目的是确定第二次监测Du研究的时间是否可以安全地推迟到evar 3年后,如果初步研究发现正常。方法:1998年至2013年间,在410次evars后1周,6个月,每年在我们的认可的非侵入性血管实验室中进行Du监测(随访:平均,35个月;范围,0.5-151个月)。 DU用于测量囊直径,intacrop endoleak峰收缩速度(PSV)和内血肢内的PSV。如果记录了胚乳,肢体狭窄或囊尺寸的增加,则进行更频繁地进行Du监测,然后进行CTA,然后是干预结果:在Du监测的基础上,在随访期间诊断出113名患者(28%)(28%)患有止吐剂或移植物肢体狭窄。有95名患者(23%),118例胚胎(15 [13%] I型,90型,II型,11 [9%] III型,2 [2%] IV型)。有18例(4%)患者肢体狭窄,定义为PSV> 300cm / s。干预在113名患者的113名患者中患有32例(28%),或者在总组的8%(共410个)中,在后续期间为0.5至151个月。在Evar du后最初正常发现的患者中只有2.2%的患者(第7条第75条)继续开发止吐剂或肢体狭窄,这与3年后的干预率为3年,而25%的患者(共85名,共85名) evar du最初发现发现(p = .0001)。结论:这些调查结果表明,如果监测DU的初始结果是正常的(没有肠胃淋浴,囊肿,狭窄,狭窄),则可以推迟后续杜监测,直到evar 3年后,具有不良临床活动的风险最小的风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of vascular surgery》 |2014年第3期|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Section of Vascular Surgery Pennsylvania Hospital Philadelphia PA United States Pennsylvania;

    Section of Vascular Surgery Pennsylvania Hospital Philadelphia PA United States;

    Section of Vascular Surgery Pennsylvania Hospital Philadelphia PA United States;

    Section of Vascular Surgery Pennsylvania Hospital Philadelphia PA United States;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 心脏血管和淋巴系外科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号