首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Higher Quality, Lower Cost with an Innovative Geriatrics Consultation Service
【24h】

Higher Quality, Lower Cost with an Innovative Geriatrics Consultation Service

机译:质量更高,较低的成本与创新的老年教育咨询服务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives To design a value‐driven, interprofessional inpatient geriatric consultation program coordinated with systems‐level changes and studied outcomes and costs. Design Propensity‐matched case–control study of older adults hospitalized at an academic medical center (AMC) who did or did not receive geriatric consultation. Setting Single tertiary‐care AMC in Portland, Oregon. Participants Adults aged 70 and older who received an inpatient geriatric consultation (n=464) and propensity‐matched controls admitted before development of the consultation program (n=2,381). Pre‐ and postintervention controls were also incorporated into cost difference‐in‐difference analyses. Measurements Daily charges, total charges, length of stay (LOS), 30‐day readmission, intensive care unit (ICU) days, Foley catheter days, total medication doses per day, high‐risk medication doses per day, advance directive and Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documentation, restraint orders, discharge to home, and mortality. Results On average, individuals who received a geriatric consultation had $611 lower charges per day than those without a consultation (p=.02). They spent on average 0.36 fewer days in the ICU (p.001). They were less likely to have restraint orders (20.0% vs 27.9%, p0.001), more likely to have a POLST (58.2% vs 44.6%, p.001), and more likely to be discharged to home (33.4% vs 28.2%, p=.03). They received fewer doses of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and antiemetics (10, 5, and 7 fewer doses per 100 patient‐days, respectively) and had lower in‐hospital mortality (2.4% vs 4%, p=.01). There was no difference in hospital LOS or 30‐day readmission. Conclusion Our consultation program resulted in significant reductions in daily charges, ICU days, potentially inappropriate medication use, and use of physical restraints and increased end‐of‐life planning. This model has potential for dissemination to other institutions operating in resource‐scarce, value‐driven settings.
机译:设计价值驱动的宗旨,侦除了与系统级变更协调的代理的住宿咨询计划,并研究了结果和成本。在学术医疗中心(AMC)住院或未获得老年咨询的老年人的设计匹配案例控制研究。在俄勒冈州波特兰设定单三级护理表格。 70岁及以上的参与者获得住院性老年咨询(N = 464)和磋商计划前的倾向匹配控制(n = 2,381)。预先和后期控制也被纳入成本差异分析。测量每日费用,总费用,入住时间(LOS),30天即入人士,重症监护单位(ICU)天,Foley导管天,每天的全部药物剂量,每天高风险药物剂量,预先指示和医师订单对于寿命维持治疗(POLST)文件,约束命令,向家庭排放和死亡率。结果平均,收到老年咨询的个人每天每天611美元,而不是没有咨询的费用(P = .02)。在ICU中平均花费0.36天(P& .001)。它们不太可能有约束命令(20.0%与27.9%,P <0.001),更可能具有Polst(58.2%与44.6%,P& .001),更有可能被排放到家中(33.4% vs 28.2%,p = .03)。他们收到较少剂量的抗精神病药,苯二氮卓和每100例患者天的抗病学(10,5和7剂量),并且患有较低的内部死亡率(2.4%vs 4%,p = .01)。医院洛杉矶或30天的入院没有区别。结论我们的咨询计划导致每日收费,ICU日,潜在不恰当的药物使用,以及使用身体抑制和更高的人寿计划。该模型具有在资源稀缺,价值驱动的设置中运行的其他机构的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号