...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Semantic and Phonemic Verbal Fluency Discrepancy in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Potential Predictor of Progression to Alzheimer's Disease
【24h】

Semantic and Phonemic Verbal Fluency Discrepancy in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Potential Predictor of Progression to Alzheimer's Disease

机译:轻度认知障碍中的语义和语音口语流畅性差异:对阿尔茨海默病的潜在预测因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives To assess the utility of verbal fluency discrepancy scores in predicting progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a cohort of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Design Case control. Setting Cases identified from new referrals to a memory clinic and controls identified from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing. Participants Of 308 individuals with MCI at baseline identified from consecutive referrals to a memory clinic and compared at with age‐, sex‐, and education‐matched controls (n=302), 161 completed 2 years of follow‐up or progressed to AD during the study period. Measurements Verbal fluency discrepancy (semantic–phonemic fluency) scores at baseline were calculated for each participant. Each case was followed with repeated neuropsychological measurements, and multidisciplinary consensus diagnosis was recorded. Results Mean discrepancy score for those who progressed to AD (2.7) was significantly lower than for those who retained a MCI diagnosis (4.8) and normal controls (7.7) (p.001). Logistic regression revealed that, for each unit decrease in discrepancy score at baseline, the odds of progressing to AD were 9% greater. (Exp(B)?=?1.09, p=.02) Conclusion Individuals with MCI have less of a semantic advantage than those without MCI. Those with MCI presenting with a phonemic advantage at initial assessment warrant close follow‐up and a high index of suspicion for progression to AD.
机译:目的是评估口头流畅性差异分数的效用,以预测具有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的个人队列中的Alzheimer疾病(广告)。设计案例控制。将新推荐的设置案件从爱尔兰纵向研究中识别的记忆诊所和对照。 308个人在基线中的308人,从连续推荐到记忆诊所并与年龄,性别和教育和教育匹配的控制(n = 302)进行比较,161人完成了2年的后续或进展到广告研究期。针对每个参与者计算术语流畅性差异(语义 - 音素流畅)评分。遵循重复的神经心理学测量,随后进行了每种情况,并记录多学科共识诊断。结果对于那些进展到AD(2.7)的人的意思是差异分数明显低于保留MCI诊断(4.8)和正常对照(7.7)(P <.001)的那些。 Logistic回归揭示了,对于每个单位在基线下差异分数降低,进展到AD的几率为9%。 (exp(b)?=?1.09,p = .02)结论MCI的个体具有比没有MCI的那些的语义优势少。在初始评估中提出了MCI的MCI,令人信赖于随访,并对广告进行进展的高度索引。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号