...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Physics, D. Applied Physics: A Europhysics Journal >In vitro comparison of direct plasma treatment and plasma activated water on Escherichia coli using a surface micro-discharge
【24h】

In vitro comparison of direct plasma treatment and plasma activated water on Escherichia coli using a surface micro-discharge

机译:使用表面微放电对大肠杆菌直接血浆治疗和血浆活性水的体外比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, our aim is to compare the inactivation of bacteria by direct plasma exposure of bacterial solution and plasma activated water (PAW) using a surface micro-discharge (SMD). Four potential factors which could affect both treatments were tested, namely the effect of low dose reactive oxygen species (ROS) pretreatment, enzymatic defence mechanism against oxidative stress, extracellular molecules, and mass transfer in liquid. We applied two power modes of the SMD, i.e. low power ozone mode and high power mode, to inactivate () in distilled water either by direct treatment (DT) or PAW. ROS pretreatment was tested by 30 M of , while superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase were used to investigate the effect of enzymatic antioxidant defense. Furthermore, the effect of extracellular molecules was examined by centrifuging and mass transfer in liquid by vortexing. In addition, reactive species in the solution were measured by titanium sulfonate, and nitrite/nitrate colorimetric method for , and and , respectively. Results indicate that vortexing and centrifuging significantly influence the bacterial reduction, while pretreatment could not induce resistance of bacteria against plasma treatment. Enzymatic antioxidants of SOD and catalase could potentially effect the inactivation and plasma chemistry yet only if the concentrations are sufficiently high. We assume that the continuous generation of peroxynitrite is crucial in plasma inactivation for both DT and PAW under high power condition, while under low power condition, long-term bactericidal affects are limited due to the decomposition of ozone by nitrite.
机译:在这项研究中,我们的目标是通过使用表面微量放电(SMD)进行细菌溶液和血浆活性水(PAW)的直接血浆暴露来比较细菌的失活。测试了可能影响这两个治疗的四种潜在因素,即低剂量反应性氧物质(ROS)预处理的效果,酶促防御机制对氧化应激,细胞外分子和液体的质量转移。我们应用了SMD的两个电源模式,即低功率臭氧模式和高功率模式,通过直接处理(DT)或爪子在蒸馏水中灭活()。 ROS预处理经过30米的测试,而超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化氢酶用于研究酶促抗氧化防御的作用。此外,通过通过涡旋离心和质量转移来检查细胞外分子的效果。此外,通过磺酸钛和亚硝酸盐/硝酸盐比色法测量溶液中的反应性物质分别为和。结果表明,涡旋和离心机显着影响细菌还原,而预处理不能诱导细菌抗血浆治疗的抗性。 SOD和过氧化氢酶的酶促抗氧化剂似乎仅在浓度足够高的情况下才能影响灭活和血浆化学。我们假设连续一代过氧硝酸盐在高功率条件下为DT和爪子的血浆灭活是至关重要的,而在低功率状态下,由于亚硝酸盐的分解,长期杀菌影响受到限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号