...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis: An International Journal on All Drug-Related Topics in Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Clinical Analysis >Two validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods with different pretreatments for the quantification of an anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody in rat and cynomolgus monkey serum compared with an electrochemiluminescence method
【24h】

Two validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods with different pretreatments for the quantification of an anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody in rat and cynomolgus monkey serum compared with an electrochemiluminescence method

机译:两种验证的液相色谱 - 质谱法,具有不同预处理的预处理,用于定量大鼠和豆蔻血清血清中的抗CD47单克隆抗体,与电化学发光法相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Establishing reliable bioanalytical methods is essential to support pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in the preclinical and clinical evaluation of monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs. Ligand binding assay (LBA) has always been the gold standard for protein quantification, whereas LC-MS has gradually become a promising alternative method for the study of pharmacokinetics of biotherapeutics with its advantages of accuracy and rapid method development. Here, we described for the first time two liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods with different purification pretreatments, protein precipitation and immune affinity (IA) enrichment, along with one electrochemiluminescence (ECL) method for the quantification of an anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody (SHR-1603) in rat and cynomolgus monkey serum. An anti-adsorption reagent was added and digestion conditions were optimized to resolve the absorption issue of hydrophobic peptide in this study. These methods were all validated according to China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines and were successfully applied to a preclinical study for the quantification of SHR-1603. The respective quantitative ranges of the three methods are respectively 250-500,000 ng/mL (protein precipitation), 100-100,000 ng/mL (IA) and 19.5-10,000 ng/mL (ECL). The two LC-MS methods were compared with ECL method respectively by the cross-validation using the Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots. Systematic differences and proportional bias were observed between two LC-MS methods on the one hand and with the ECL method on the other hand. The drug concentrations obtained by the three methods showed good agreement in the low-dose group (ratios of drug exposure, 1.05-1.11), whereas the drug concentrations measured using the LC-MS methods were higher than those obtained by the ECL method in medium-dose and high-dose groups, which can be attributed to the forms of antibodies being determined (free and total). In conclusion, the established LC-MS methods exhibited superior accuracy, efficiency and cost-effectiveness for the PK assessment of SHR-1603 in the preclinical study. Thus, it provides a promising alternative to LBA in pre-clinical and clinical evaluation studies of mAb drugs in various matrices to facilitate the development of anti-tumor drugs. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:建立可靠的生物分析方法对于支持单克隆抗体(MAB)药物的临床前和临床评价中的药代动力学(PK)研究至关重要。配体结合测定(LBA)始终是蛋白质定量的金标准,而LC-MS逐渐成为一种有前途的替代方法,用于研究生物治疗方法的药代动力学,其优点和快速的方法发育。这里,我们描述了第一次进行两种液相色谱 - 质谱(LC-MS)方法,具有不同的纯化预处理,蛋白质沉淀和免疫亲和力(IA)富集,以及一种电化学发光(ECL)方法,用于定量抗议性CD47单克隆抗体(SHR-1603)在大鼠和Cynomolgus猴子血清中。加入抗吸附试剂并优化消化条件以解决该研究中疏水性肽的吸收问题。这些方法全部验证,根据中国食品和药物管理局(CFDA)和欧洲药物局(EMA)指南验证,并成功地应用于SHR-1603量化的临床前研究。三种方法的各自定量范围分别为250-500,000ng / ml(蛋白质沉淀),100-100,000ng / ml(Ia)和19.5-10,000ng / ml(ECL)。将两个LC-MS方法与使用通过Bablok回归和Bland-Altman图的交叉验证进行了比较了ECL方法。在一方面,在两个LC-MS方法之间观察到系统差异和比例偏差,另一方面用ECL方法观察到。通过三种方法获得的药物浓度在低剂量组(药物暴露的比例,1.05-1.11)中显示出良好的一致性,而使用LC-MS方法测量的药物浓度高于通过培养基中的ECL方法获得的药物浓度高 - 糖和高剂量基团,其可归因于确定的抗体形式(自由和总量)。总之,已建立的LC-MS方法对临床前研究中SHR-1603的PK评估表现出卓越的准确性,效率和成本效益。因此,它为各种基质中的MAB药物预临床和临床评价研究提供了对LBA的有希望的替代方案,以促进抗肿瘤药物的发育。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号