...
首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in pulmonary medicine >Community-acquired pneumonia in casualty: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management (or a look at the 'new' in pneumonia since 2002).
【24h】

Community-acquired pneumonia in casualty: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management (or a look at the 'new' in pneumonia since 2002).

机译:社区获得性伤亡性肺炎:病因,临床特征,诊断和治疗(或从2002年开始观察“新”的肺炎)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Community-acquired pneumonia, because of its substantial treatment costs, incidence, and mortality, is an aggressively researched diagnosis. In this review, we highlight new developments in the diagnosis, etiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention of community-acquired pneumonia published since April 2002. RECENT FINDINGS: The combined end points of improved patient care and conservation of health care resources have prompted several studies examining current professional society community-acquired pneumonia guidelines. In general, patients treated with the recommended third-generation cephalosporin and macrolide or an antipneumococcal fluoroquinolone when indicated have fared better, including reduced overall costs, inpatient days, and mortality, than those receiving alternative treatments. Etiologic identification efforts by traditional methods, blood and sputum cultures, are being questioned owing to poor success rates and, even when positive, are being underused or ignored in antibiotic selection and patient management. Newer diagnostic tests are becoming commercially available, along with tests for biologic markers that have been only recently identified as contributors to, or prognosticators of, community-acquired pneumonia. Because antibiotic resistance remains a major obstacle to successful patient treatment, prevention or mitigation of community-acquired pneumonia is gaining increasing popularity through more aggressive pneumococcal and influenza vaccination of at risk groups, even before hospital discharge from a community-acquired pneumonia admission. SUMMARY: Although prevention is our best defense, current community-acquired pneumonia treatment guidelines are effective for treatment and cost containment. However, they should be scrutinized in light of clinical utilization data now entering the literature regarding their testing recommendations. Providers should consider encouraging focused culturing of sicker patients and those with significant comorbidities.
机译:审查的目的:社区获得性肺炎,由于其大量的治疗费用,发病率和死亡率,是一项积极研究的诊断。在这篇综述中,我们重点介绍了自2002年4月以来发表的社区获得性肺炎的诊断,病因,病理生理学,治疗和预防方面的新进展。最近的发现:改善患者护理和节省医疗资源的综合终点促使许多人研究检查当前专业协会社区获得的肺炎指南。通常,与其他治疗相比,接受推荐的第三代头孢菌素和大环内酯类药物或抗肺炎球菌氟喹诺酮类药物治疗的患者情况更好,包括降低了总成本,住院天数和死亡率。由于成功率低,人们一直质疑通过传统方法,血液和痰培养物进行病因鉴定的努力,即使是阳性的,在抗生素选择和患者管理中也没有得到充分利用或忽略。较新的诊断测试以及最近才被确定为导致社区获得性肺炎的生物标志物或对其进行预后的生物标志物的检测方法正在商业上获得。由于抗生素耐药性仍然是成功治疗患者的主要障碍,因此,即使在社区获得性肺炎住院治疗出院前,通过对更具风险的人群进行更具侵略性的肺炎球菌和流感疫苗接种,预防或减轻社区获得性肺炎正变得越来越受欢迎。简介:尽管预防是我们最好的防御措施,但当前社区获得的肺炎治疗指南对治疗和控制成本有效。但是,应根据有关其测试建议的文献中的临床利用数据对它们进行仔细检查。提供者应考虑鼓励对病患者和合并症严重的患者进行有针对性的培养。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号