...
首页> 外文期刊>World neurosurgery >Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis
【24h】

Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis

机译:侧腰椎椎体间融合的多孔添加剂制造笼的生物力学分析:有限元分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BackgroundA porous additive manufactured (AM) cage may provide stability similar to that of traditional solid cages and may be beneficial to bone ingrowth. The biomechanical influence of various porous cages on stability, subsidence, stresses in cage, and facet contact force has not been fully described. The purpose of this study was to verify biomechanical effects of porous AM cages. MethodsThe surgical finite element models with various cages were constructed. The partially porous titanium (PPT) cages and fully porous titanium (FPT) cages were applied. The mechanical parameters of porous materials were obtained by mechanical test. Then the porous AM cages were compared with solid titanium (TI) cage and solid polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. The 4 motion modes were simulated. Range of motion (ROM), cage stress, end plate stress, and facet joint force (FJF) were compared. ResultsFor all the surgical models, ROM decreased by >90%. Compared with TI and PPT cages, PEEK and FPT cages substantially reduced the maximum stresses in cage and end plate in all motion modes. Compared with PEEK cages, the stresses in cage and end plate for FPT cages decreased, whereas the ROM increased. Comparing FPT cages, the stresses in cage and end plate decreased with?increasing porosity, whereas ROM increased with increasing porosity. After interbody fusion, FJF was substantially reduced in all motion modes except for flexion. ConclusionsFully porous cages may offer an alternative to solid PEEK cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion. However, it may be prudent to further increase the porosity of the cage.
机译:背景区域制造的(AM)笼子可以提供类似于传统固体笼中的稳定性,并且可能有利于骨骼骨骼。各种多孔笼对静稳定性,沉降,笼中的应力和方面接触力的生物力学影响尚未得到充分描述。本研究的目的是验证多孔AM笼的生物力学效果。方法构建了具有各种笼子的外科有限元模型。部分多孔钛(PPT)笼和完全多孔钛(FPT)笼。通过机械测试获得多孔材料的机械参数。然后将多孔am笼与固体钛(Ti)笼和固体聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼进行比较。模拟了4种运动模式。比较运动范围(ROM),保持架应力,端板应力和面关节力(FJF)。结果所有手术模型,ROM下降> 90%。与TI和PPT笼相比,PEEK和FPT笼在所有运动模式下大大降低了笼和端板的最大应力。与PEEK笼相比,FPT笼的笼子和端板中的应力下降,而ROM增加。比较FPT笼,笼中的应力和端板的应力随孔隙率的增加而降低,而ROM随着孔隙率的增加而增加。在椎体融合之后,除了屈曲外,FJF在所有运动模式下大大降低。结论是多孔笼子可以在横向腰椎间融合中提供孤立的固体窥视笼替代品。然而,它可能是谨慎的,进一步增加笼子的孔隙率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号