首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Comparison of a physical model and phenomenological model to forecast groundwater levels in a rainfall-induced deep-seated landslide
【24h】

Comparison of a physical model and phenomenological model to forecast groundwater levels in a rainfall-induced deep-seated landslide

机译:物理模型与现象学模型预测降雨诱导的深层滑坡地下水位的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Increases in groundwater levels play an important role in triggering deep-seated landslides. As such, it is important to be able to accurately predict variations in groundwater levels. In order to select a more suitable method for the prediction of groundwater levels in relation to deep-seated landslides, a comparative study was conducted between a physical model and phenomenological model. The physical model is a finite-element seepage code named Slide by Rocscience. The phenomenological model is a Particle Swarm Optimization Support Vector Machine (PSO-SVM). In order to obtain more accurate calculated results from the physical seepage model, the input parameters of the physical seepage model were calibrated by using a trial-error method to compare the computed results with actual monitoring data. The input data of the phenomenological model were also processed in order to obtain more accurate calculated results. The results showed that the physical seepage model was difficult to well calibrate in the condition of less data and hence performed poorly. The validation results showed that the phenomenological model performed better. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of phenomenological model were 0.052 m and 0.043 m, respectively, compared with the values of physical seepage model were 0.92 m and 0.81 m, respectively. It means if constructing a satisfactory physical seepage model was difficult or understanding of physical process could not be considered, the phenomenological model might be sufficient.
机译:地下水位的增加在触发深层滑坡方面发挥着重要作用。因此,重要的是能够准确地预测地下水位的变化。为了选择更合适的方法,用于预测地下水位与深层滑坡的地下水位,在物理模型和现象模型之间进行比较研究。物理模型是通过RocSCIECE命名幻灯片的有限元渗漏代码。现象学模型是粒子群优化支持向量机(PSO-SVM)。为了获得来自物理渗漏模型的更准确的计算结果,通过使用试用错误方法将物理渗漏模型的输入参数进行校准,以将计算结果与实际监视数据进行比较。还处理了现象模型的输入数据,以获得更准确的计算结果。结果表明,物理渗流模型在数据较少的条件下难以很好地校准,因此表现不佳。验证结果表明,现象学模型表现更好。现象模型的根均方误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为0.052米和0.043米,与物理渗流模型的值分别为0.92米和0.81米。这意味着如果构建令人满意的物理渗流模型是困难或理解物理过程,则该现象学模型可能就足够了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号