...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Face-to-Face and Internet-Based Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Compared With Treatment as Usual in Reducing Psychological Distress in Patients With Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Face-to-Face and Internet-Based Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Compared With Treatment as Usual in Reducing Psychological Distress in Patients With Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:基于面对面和基于互联网的心灵的认知治疗与常规治疗减少癌症患者的心理困扰:多中心随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeMindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) has been shown to alleviate psychological distress in patients with cancer. However, patients experience barriers to participating in face-to-face MBCT. Individual Internet-based MBCT (eMBCT) could be an alternative. The study aim was to compare MBCT and eMBCT with treatment as usual (TAU) for psychological distress in patients with cancer.Patients and MethodsWe obtained ethical and safety approval to include 245 patients with cancer with psychological distress ( 11 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) in the study. They were randomly allocated to MBCT (n = 77), eMBCT (n = 90), or TAU (n = 78). Patients completed baseline (T0) and postintervention (T1) assessments. The primary outcome was psychological distress on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Secondary outcomes were psychiatric diagnosis, fear of cancer recurrence, rumination, health-related quality of life, mindfulness skills, and positive mental health. Continuous outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed modeling on the intention-to-treat sample. Because both interventions were compared with TAU, the type I error rate was set at P .025.ResultsCompared with TAU, patients reported significantly less psychological distress after both MBCT (Cohen's d, .45; P .001) and eMBCT (Cohen's d, .71; P .001) . In addition, post-treatment prevalence of psychiatric diagnosis was lower with both MBCT (33% improvement; P = .030) and eMBCT (29% improvement; P = .076) in comparison with TAU (16%), but these changes were not statistically significant. Both interventions reduced fear of cancer recurrence and rumination, and increased mental health-related quality of life, mindfulness skills, and positive mental health compared with TAU (all Ps .025). Physical health-related quality of life did not improve (P = .343).ConclusionCompared with TAU, MBCT and eMBCT were similarly effective in reducing psychological distress in a sample of distressed heterogeneous patients with cancer.
机译:基于目的地的基于患者的认知治疗(MBCT)已被证明缓解癌症患者的心理困扰。然而,患者体验参与面对面MBCT的障碍。基于互联网的MBCT(EMBCT)可能是替代品。该研究目的是将MBCT和empct与癌症患者患者的心理困扰进行比较.Patiant和方法获得了道德和安全批准,包括245名患有心理困扰的癌症(11人焦虑和抑郁症11例)在研究中。将它们随机分配给MBCT(n = 77),embct(n = 90),或tau(n = 78)。患者完成基线(T0)和初期(T1)评估。主要结果是医院焦虑和抑郁症的心理困扰。二次结果是精神病诊断,恐惧癌症复发,谣言,与生命健康的生活质量,心灵技能和积极的心理健康。使用线性混合建模对意图对治疗样品进行分析的连续结果。由于两种干预措施与TAU进行了比较,所以I型错误率被设置为P& .025.与Tau进行评估,患者在MBCT(COHEN的D,0.45; P&)和embct(COHEN的D,0.71; P <.001)后,患者报告的心理窘迫显着较低。此外,与TAU(16%)相比,MBCT(改善33%)和embct(29%改善; P = .076),精神诊断后的治疗后患病率较低没有统计学意义。两种干预措施减少了对癌症复发和谣言的恐惧,以及与TAU(所有PS& .025)相比的心理健康有关的生活质量,心灵技能和积极的心理健康。与身体健康有关的生活质量没有改善(p = .343)。与Tau,MBCT和EMBCT共聚,MBCT和EMBCT在减少患有癌症样本中的心理困扰方面同样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号