...
首页> 外文期刊>Current treatment options in neurology >Nonconvulsive Seizure Control in the Intensive Care Unit
【24h】

Nonconvulsive Seizure Control in the Intensive Care Unit

机译:重症监护病房的非惊厥性癫痫发作控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) occur in as many as 20 % of comatose critically ill patients. These seizures need to be treated; however, the urgency with which this must be done and the medications that should be used are unclear. Often, data from treatment of convulsive status epilepticus (SE) is used to determine the best therapy for NCS. This may lead to "overtreatment" with sedating medications that prolongs hospitalization and worsens outcome. Nonsedating antiepileptic drug (AED) use is favored by many neurologists as the side effect profile is superior to sedating medications. Though limited, the available data suggests that valproic acid and lacosamide may be preferable to phenytoin/fosphenytoin and levetiracetam based on efficacy and side effect profiles. Other AEDs such as topiramate and pregabalin have also been used, but their data is even more limited, and they do not have an intravenous formulation. Clinical trials that have recently been completed and those that are ongoing will further inform our decisions about which drugs to use in the future.
机译:非惊厥性癫痫(NCS)发生在多达20%的昏迷危重患者中。这些癫痫发作需要治疗;但是,尚不清楚必须执行的紧迫性和应使用的药物。通常,使用惊厥性癫痫持续状态(SE)的治疗数据来确定NCS的最佳治疗方法。这可能会导致镇静药物“过度治疗”,从而延长住院时间并恶化结局。许多神经科医生赞成使用非镇静抗癫痫药(AED),因为其副作用要优于镇静药物。尽管有限,但现有数据表明,基于功效和副作用,丙戊酸和拉考酰胺可能优于苯妥英/去甲苯妥英和左乙拉西坦。还使用了其他AED,例如托吡酯和普瑞巴林,但其数据更为有限,并且没有静脉内制剂。最近完成的临床试验和正在进行的临床试验将进一步告知我们有关将来使用哪种药物的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号