...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Animal Science >Association between antimicrobial drug class selection for treatment and retreatment of bovine respiratory disease and health, performance, and carcass quality outcomes in feedlot cattle
【24h】

Association between antimicrobial drug class selection for treatment and retreatment of bovine respiratory disease and health, performance, and carcass quality outcomes in feedlot cattle

机译:饲料牛牛呼吸道疾病和健康,性能和胴体质量结果的抗菌药品课程选择与饲料牛牛的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Treatment and control of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is predicated on the use of two categories of antimicrobials, namely bacteriostatic drugs that inhibit bacterial growth and replication (STATIC), and bactericidal drugs that kill bacteria in in vitro culture systems (CIDAL). Recently, we reported that initial BRD treatment with a STATIC antimicrobial followed by retreatment with a CIDAL antimicrobial was associated with a higher frequency of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from field cases of BRD submitted to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory. The present study was conducted to test the hypothesis that calves administered the same class of antimicrobial for first and second BRD treatment (i.e., CIDAL-CIDAL or STATIC-STATIC) would have improved health and performance outcomes at the feedlot compared to calves that received a different antimicrobial class for retreatment (i.e., STATIC-CIDAL or CIDAL-STATIC). The association between antimicrobial treatments and health, performance, and carcass quality outcomes were determined by a retrospective analysis of 4,252 BRD treatment records from a commercial feedlot operation collected from 2001 to 2005. Data were compared using generalized linear mixed statistical models that included gender, season, and arrival weight as covariates. The mean (+/- SE) probability of BRD cases identified as requiring four or more treatments compared to three treatments was greater in calves that received STATIC-CIDAL (73.58 +/- 2.38%) or STATIC-STATIC (71.32 +/- 2.52%) first and second antimicrobial treatments compared to calves receiving CIDAL-CIDAL (50.35 +/- 3.46%) first and second treatments (P < 0.001). Calves receiving CIDAL-CIDAL first and second treatments also had an increased average daily gain (1.11 +/- 0.03 kg/d) compared to calves receiving STATIC-CIDAL (0.95 +/- 0.03 kg/d) and STATIC-STATIC (0.84 +/- 0.02 kg/d) treatments (P < 0.001). Furthermore, CIDAL-CIDAL-treated calves had a higher probability of a choice quality grade at slaughter (36.44 +/- 4.80%) compared to STATIC-CIDAL calves (28.09 +/- 3.88%) (P = 0.037). There was no effect of antimicrobial treatment combination on BRD mortality (P = 0.855) or yield grade (P = 0.240) outcomes.These observations suggest that consideration should be given to antimicrobial pharmacodynamics when selecting drugs for retreatment of BRD. These findings have implications for developing BRD treatment protocols that address both post-treatment production and antimicrobial stewardship concerns.
机译:牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)的处理和控制是对使用两类抗微生物的使用,即抑制细菌生长和复制(静态)的抑菌药物,以及杀死体外培养系统(凝视物)的杀菌药物的杀菌药物。最近,我们报道了用静态抗微生物的初始BRD治疗,然后用携带型抗微生物进行后退,与从提交给兽医诊断实验室的BRD的现场情况中分离的多药抗性细菌的较高频率相关。进行了本研究以测试犊牛给予同一类别抗菌治疗(即,CIDAL-CIDAL或静态静态)给药的假设会在接受A的小牛比较饲料中改善健康和性能结果。用于撤退的不同抗菌类(即,静态 - 携带或静态静态)。抗菌治疗与健康,性能和胴体质量结果之间的关联是通过从2001年至2005年收集的商业饲养行动的4,252 BRD治疗记录的回顾性分析确定。使用包括性别,季节的广义线性混合统计模型进行比较数据,以及作为协变量的到达体重。鉴定为需要四种或更多个处理的BRD病例的平均值(+/- SE)与三种处理相比,犊牛的静态凝固(73.58 +/- 2.38%)或静态静态(71.32 +/- 2.52 %)第一和第二抗微生物处理与接受CIDAL-CIDAL的犊牛(50.35 +/- 3.46%)第一和第二种处理(P <0.001)。与接受静电(0.95 +/- 0.03kg / d)和静态静态(0.84 +的犊牛(0.84 +)相比,接受携带舞机的婴儿潮(0.11 +/- 0.03kg / d)也具有增加的平均每日增益(1.11 +/- 0.03kg / d)。 / - 0.02 kg / d)治疗(p <0.001)。此外,与静电小牛犊牛相比(28.09 +/- 3.88%)(P = 0.037)相比,CIDAL-CIDAL治疗的犊牛在屠宰时的选择质量等级(36.44 +/- 4.80%)的概率更高(36.44 +/- 4.80%)(p = 0.037)。抗菌治疗组合对BRD死亡率(P = 0.855)或产量等级(P = 0.240)结果没有影响。这些观察表明,应在选择抗菌药物动力学时,选择用于再生BRD的药物。这些调查结果对开发BRD治疗方案的影响,这些方案解决了治疗后的产量和抗微生物管制的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号