Drs Tobian and Gray, in their defense of male circumcision, have ignored arguments and evidence in opposition. A similar commentary by Cooper et al2 was recently published in Australia, followed by a circumcision policy statement from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians that opposed the procedure. After an exhaustive review of the evidence, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians found that "in low prevalence populations .. . circumcision does not provide significant protection against STIs and HIV," and concluded that there was no medical case for neonatal circumcision.
展开▼
机译：在他们对男性割礼的辩护中，博览会和灰色博士忽视了反对派的论据和证据。 Cooper et Al2的类似评论最近在澳大利亚公布，其次是来自澳大利亚皇家医师学院的割礼政策声明，反对该程序。 彻底审查了证据后，澳大利亚皇家的医生学院发现“在低普遍存在的人口中。”，“包皮环切”并没有提供对抗STI和艾滋病毒的显着保护，并得出结论，Neanatal Cablcircion没有医学案例。
展开▼
