...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With T1D Are Impacted More by Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than by Insulin Delivery Method: 3 Years of Follow-Up From the COMISAIR Study
【24h】

Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With T1D Are Impacted More by Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than by Insulin Delivery Method: 3 Years of Follow-Up From the COMISAIR Study

机译:具有T1D的成年人的血糖结果通过连续葡萄糖监测影响多于胰岛素递送方法:来自Comisair学习的3年后续行动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE This study assessed the clinical impact of four treatment strategies in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D): real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) with multiple daily insulin injections (rtCGM+MDI), rtCGM with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (rtCGM+CSII), self-monitoring of blood glucose with MDI (SMBG+MDI), and SMBG with CSII (SMBG+CSII). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 3-year, nonrandomized, prospective, real-world, clinical trial followed 94 participants with T1D (rtCGM+MDI, n = 22; rtCGM+CSII, n = 26; SMBG+MDI, n = 21; SMBG+CSII, n = 25). The main end points were changes in A1C, time in range (70-180 mg/dL [3.9-10 mmol/L]), time below range (<70 mg/dL [<3.9 mmol/L]), glycemic variability, and incidence of hypoglycemia. RESULTS At 3 years, the rtCGM groups (rtCGM+MDI and rtCGM+CSII) had significantly lower A1C (7.0% [53 mmol/mol], P = 0.0002, and 6.9% [52 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001, respectively), compared with the SMBG+CSII and SMBG+MDI groups (7.7% [61 mmol/mol], P = 0.3574, and 8.0% [64 mmol/mol], P = 1.000, respectively), with no significant difference between the rtCGM groups. Significant improvements in percentage of time in range were observed in the rtCGM subgroups (rtCGM+MDI, 48.7-69.0%, P < 0.0001; and rtCGM+CSII, 50.9-72.3%, P < 0.0001) and in the SMBG+CSII group (50.6-57.8%, P = 0.0114). Significant reductions in time below range were found only in the rtCGM subgroups (rtCGM+MDI, 9.4-5.5%, P = 0.0387; and rtCGM+CSII, 9.0-5.3%, P = 0.0235). Seven severe hypoglycemia episodes occurred: SMBG groups, n = 5; sensor-augmented insulin regimen groups, n = 2. CONCLUSIONS rtCGM was superior to SMBG in reducing A1C, hypoglycemia, and other end points in individuals with T1D regardless of their insulin delivery method. rtCGM+MDI can be considered an equivalent but lower-cost alternative to sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and superior to treatment with SMBG+MDI or SMBG+CSII therapy.
机译:目的本研究评估了患有1型糖尿病(T1D)的四种治疗策略的临床影响:具有多个日常胰岛素注射(RTCGM + MDI)的实时连续葡萄糖监测(RTCGM),具有连续皮下胰岛素输注的RTCGM(RTCGM + CSII),用MDI(SMBG + MDI)的血糖自我监测,以及具有CSII(SMBG + CSII)的SMBG。研究设计与方法这项3年,非扫描,前瞻性,现实世界,临床试验遵循T1D(RTCGM + MDI,N = 22; RTCGM + CSII,N = 26; SMBG + MDI,N = 21; SMBG + CSII,n = 25)。主要终点在A1C中的变化,范围内(70-180mg / dL [3.9-10mmol / L]),低于范围(<70mg / dl [<3.9mmol / l]),血糖变异性,和低血糖发病率。结果3年,RTCGM(RTCGM + MDI和RTCGM + CSII)显着降低A1C(7.0%[53mmol / mol],P = 0.0002和6.9%[52mmol / mol],P <0.0001 ),与SMBG + CSII和SMBG + MDI基团(7.7%[61mmol / mol],P = 0.3574和8.0%[64mmol / mol],P = 1.000,P = 1.000)之间没有显着差异RTCGM组。在RTCGM亚组(RTCGM + MDI,48.7-69.0%,P <0.0001和RTCGM + CSII,50.9-72.3%,P <0.0001)和SMBG + CSII组中,观察到范围内的时间百分比的显着改善50.6-57.8%,p = 0.0114)。仅在RTCGM亚组(RTCGM + MDI,9.4-5.5%,P = 0.0387中仅发现范围以下的时间显着降低;和RTCGM + CSII,9.0-5.3%,P = 0.0235)。七次严重低血糖发生:SMBG组,n = 5;传感器增强的胰岛素方案组,n = 2.结论RTCGM在减少A1C,低血糖和具有T1D的个体中的其他端点时优于SMBG,无论其胰岛素递送方法如何。 RTCGM + MDI可被认为是传感器增强胰岛素泵治疗的等效但低成本的替代品,优于SMBG + MDI或SMBG + CSII治疗。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Diabetes care》 |2020年第1期|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 2 Dept Paediat Prague Czech Republic;

    Grunberger Diabet Inst Bloomfield Hills MI USA;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    CGParkin Commun Inc Henderson NV USA;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

    Charles Univ Prague Fac Med 1 Dept Internal Med 3 Prague Czech Republic;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 内分泌腺疾病及代谢病;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号