首页> 外文会议>International conference on advancements of medicine and health care through technology >Assessing Glycemic Control in Diabetes: From Self Monitoring of Blood Glucose to Continuous Glucose Monitoring System
【24h】

Assessing Glycemic Control in Diabetes: From Self Monitoring of Blood Glucose to Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

机译:评估糖尿病患者的血糖控制:从血糖自我监测到连续血糖监测系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The incidence of diabetes is increasing at an alarming rate. Maintaining tight glycemic control is essential to prevent microvascular and macrovascular complications as demonstrated by many studies. Current recommendation for HbAlc is less then 7% and even 6.5% in special individuals. HbAlc measurement is considered the gold standard of diabetes care and serves as a surrogate of diabetes-related complications, but it does not provide information about glycemic excursions. For these reasons, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) levels is considered an important adjunct to HbAlc measurements for achieving and maintaining glycemic control and consequently for reducing diabetes-related complications. A new method that offers us a complete investigation of glucose excursions is continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) that measure glucose concentration in subcutaneous interstitial fluid which can reflect changes in blood glucose concentrations reasonably quickly every 5 min throughout 72 hours (3 days). The aim of this paper was to evaluate the different methods of assessing glucose control in individuals with diabetes melli-tus and to compare themselves in order to establish the clinical relevance. We assessed the glycemic control by HbAlc, SMBG and CGMS Gold simultaneously in a number of 97 individuals with diabetes. 20 individuals have a HbAlc between 6,5 -7,4%, 33 patients between 7,5-8,4%, 15 between 8,5-9,4%, 10 between 9,5 - 10.5% and 7 persons more than 10,5%. It was observed that between HbAlc level and the period spent in glycemic values more than 180 mg/dl there is not a direct relationship as we expected. The same trend was observed in near normal glycemic status but in different way. Assessing of glycemia in diabetes is crucially important to the prevention of both acute and long - term complications. The 3 fundamental approaches to assessment, HbAlc, SMBG and CGM provide fundamentally different but complementary information.
机译:糖尿病的发病率正以惊人的速度增加。许多研究表明,保持严格的血糖控制对预防微血管和大血管并发症至关重要。目前推荐的HbAlc在特殊人群中低于7%,甚至6.5%。 HbAlc测量被认为是糖尿病护理的金标准,可作为糖尿病相关并发症的替代品,但它不提供有关血糖波动的信息。由于这些原因,血糖自我监测(SMBG)水平被认为是HbAlc测量的重要辅助手段,可实现并维持血糖控制,从而减少与糖尿病相关的并发症。为我们提供了一个完整的葡萄糖漂移研究的新方法是连续葡萄糖监测系统(CGMS),它可以测量皮下组织液中的葡萄糖浓度,该值可以在整个72小时(3天)中每5分钟相当快地反映出血糖浓度的变化。本文的目的是评估评估糖尿病患者血糖控制的不同方法,并进行自我比较以建立临床相关性。我们同时评估了HbAlc,SMBG和CGMS Gold对97例糖尿病患者的血糖控制。 20个人的HbAlc在6.5%-7,4%之间,33位患者在7,5-8,4%之间,15位在8,5-9,4%之间,10位在9,5-10.5%之间,还有7个人超过10.5%。据观察,在HbAlc水平和血糖值花费超过180 mg / dl的时间之间,没有我们预期的直接关系。在接近正常的血糖状态中观察到相同的趋势,但是方式不同。糖尿病中的血糖评估对于预防急性和长期并发症至关重要。 HbAlc,SMBG和CGM这3种基本评估方法提供了根本不同但互补的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号