首页> 外文期刊>Hepatology: Official Journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases >Development and Validation of a Mathematical Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Cirrhosis: The Royal Free Hospital Cirrhosis Glomerular Filtration Rate
【24h】

Development and Validation of a Mathematical Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Cirrhosis: The Royal Free Hospital Cirrhosis Glomerular Filtration Rate

机译:数学方程的发展与验证肝硬化肾小球过滤率的数学方程:皇家自由医院肝硬化肾小球过滤速率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current expressions based on serum creatinine concentration overestimate kidney function in cirrhosis, leading to significant differences between "true" and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We compared the performance of the four-variable and six-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and chronic kidney disease epidemiology with "true," or measured, GFR (mGFR) and the impact of this difference on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) calculation. We subsequently developed and validated a GFR equation specifically for cirrhosis and compared the performance of the new derived formula with existing GFR formulae. We included 469 consecutive patients who had a transplant assessment between 2011 and 2014. mGFR was measured using plasma isotope clearance according to a technique validated in patients with ascites. A corrected creatinine was derived from the mGFR after application of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Subsequently, a corrected MELD was calculated and compared with the conventionally calculated MELD. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used to derive a GFR equation. This was compared with the mGFR in independent external and internal validation sets of 82 and 174 patients with cirrhosis, respectively. A difference >20 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) between existing formulae and mGFR was observed in 226 (48.2%) patients. The corrected MELD score was >= 3 points higher in 177 (37.7%) patients. The predicted equation (r(2) = 74.6%) was GFR = 45.9 x (creatinine(-0-836)) x (urea(-0 -229)) (international normalized ratio(-0 -113)) x (age(-0.129) [ Corrected November 29, 2016: originally written as "age-129."]) x (sodium(0.972)) x 0.809 (if female) x 0.92 (if moderate/severe ascites). An online calculator is available at http://rfh-cirrhosis-gfr. ucl. ac. uk. The model was a good fit and showed the greatest accuracy compared to that of existing formulae. Conclusion: We developed and validated a new accurate model for GFR assessment in cirrhosis, the Royal Free Hospital cirrhosis GFR, using readily available variables; this remains to be tested and incorporated in prognostic scores in patients with cirrhosis.
机译:基于血清肌酐浓度高估肾功能的当前表达,导致“真实”与计算肾小球过滤速率(GFR)之间的显着差异。我们将肾病和慢性肾病流行病学的四变量和六种变量改性的性能进行了比较,“真实”或测量,GFR(MGFR)以及这种差异对终级肝病模型的影响(融合)计算。我们随后开发并验证了专门针对肝硬化的GFR方程,并与现有GFR公式进行了新的衍生公式的性能。我们包括2011和2014年间移植评估的连续469名患者。根据腹水验证的技术,使用血浆同位素清除测量MGFR。在施用肾疾病配方饮食改性后,衍生矫正肌酐。随后,计算并将校正的融合物计算并与常规计算的融合相比。逐步多个线性回归用于导出GFR方程。将其与肝硬化患者的独立外部和内部验证组中的MGFR进行比较。在226名(48.2%)患者中观察到现有式和MGFR之间的差异> 20mL /分钟/ 1.73m(2)。矫正融合得分> 177(37.7%)患者较高。预测的等式(R(2)= 74.6%)是GFR = 45.9×(肌酐(-0-836))x(尿素(-0-229))(国际归一化比率(-0 -113))x(年龄(-0.129)[纠正2016年11月29日:最初写入“年龄-129”)x(钠(0.972))×0.809(如果是女性)x 0.92(如果中等/严重腹水)。在HTTP:// RFH-CIRRRHOSION-GFR提供了一个在线计算器。 UCL。 AC。英国。与现有公式相比,该模型非常适合并显示最大的准确性。结论:我们开发并验证了肝硬化,皇家自由医院Cirrhosis GFR,使用易于获得的变量来制定并验证了GFR评估的新模型;这仍有待测试和纳入肝硬化患者的预后分数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号