...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Center Volume Is Associated With Outcome After Pancreas Transplantation Within the Eurotransplant Region
【24h】

Center Volume Is Associated With Outcome After Pancreas Transplantation Within the Eurotransplant Region

机译:中心体积与Eurotraplant地区内胰腺移植后的结果相关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. Outcome after surgery depends on several factors, among these, the annual volume-outcome relationship. This might also be the case in a highly complex field as pancreas transplantation. No study has investigated this relationship in a European setting. Methods. All consecutive pancreas transplantations from January 2008 until December 2013 were included. Donor-, recipient-, and transplant-related factors were analyzed for their association with patient and graft survivals. Centers were classified in equally sized groups as being low volume (<5 transplantations on average each year in the 5 preceding years), medium volume (5-13/year), or high volume (>= 13/year). Results. In the study period, 1276 pancreas transplantations were included. Un-adjusted 1-year patient survival was associated with center volume and was best in high volume centers, compared with medium and low volume: 96.5%, 94% and 92.3%, respectively (P = 0.017). Pancreas donor risk index (PDRI) was highest in high volume centers: 1.38 versus 1.21 in medium and 1.25 in low volume centers (P < 0.001). Pancreas graft survival at 1 year did not differ significantly between volume categories: 86%, 83.2%, and 81.6%, respectively (P = 0.114). After multivariate Cox-regression analysis, higher PDRI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; P < 0.001), retransplantation (HR, 1.91; P = 0.002), and higher recipient body mass index (HR, 1.04; P = 0.024) were risk factors for pancreas graft failure. High center volume was protective for graft failure (HR, 0.70; P = 0.037) compared with low center volume. Conclusion. Patient and graft survival after pancreas transplantation are superior in higher volume centers. High volume centers have good results, even though they transplant organs with the highest PDRI.
机译:背景。手术后的结果取决于几个因素,其中包括年度批量关系。这也可能是一种高度复杂的领域的情况,作为胰腺移植。没有研究在欧洲环境中调查了这种关系。方法。包括2008年1月至2013年12月的所有连续胰腺移植。分析与患者和移植物幸存者的关联分析供体,受体和移植相关因素。中心被分类为同等大小的群体,作为低体积(每年平均移植,前一年的5-13 /年),或大容量(> = 13 /年)。结果。在研究期间,包括1276个胰腺移植。未调整的1年患者存活与中心体积相关,最佳位于高批量中心,与中低体积相比,分别为96.5%,94%和92.3%(P = 0.017)。胰腺供体风险指数(PDRI)在高批量中心中最高:1.38对1.21中的培养基和1.25,低体积中心(P <0.001)。胰腺移植物存活率在1年内没有显着不同:86%,83.2%和81.6%(P = 0.114)。在多变量COX回归分析后,较高的PDRI(危险比[HR],1.60; P <0.001),重新分析(HR,1.91; P = 0.002),更高的受体体质量指数(HR,1.04; P = 0.024)是胰腺移植失败的危险因素。与低中心体积相比,高中心体积适用于接枝衰竭(HR,0.70; P = 0.037)。结论。胰腺移植后的患者和移植物存活率在更高的体积中心优越。高批量中心具有良好的效果,即使它们与最高PDRI移植器官。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号