首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation Proceedings >Prospective Comparison of Equations Based on Creatinine and Cystatin C for the Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients
【24h】

Prospective Comparison of Equations Based on Creatinine and Cystatin C for the Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients

机译:基于肌酐和胱抑素C肾移植受者肾小球过滤速率估算的前瞻性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Currently, there is no dedicated equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for transplanted kidneys. This study aimed to compare the performance of serum creatinine (Scr)- and cystatin C (CysC)-based equations in Chinese renal transplant recipients. Methods A total of 252 stable renal transplant recipients were enrolled in this study. The plasma clearance of 99m Tc-DTPA (rGFR) was used as a reference standard. The Scr, CysC, and rGFR of the patients were measured on the same day. The bias, precision, accuracy (percentage of estimates within 10%, 30%, and 50% of rGFR), and agreements of 8 Scr and 5 CysC eGFR equations were assessed. The factors affecting the accuracy were also evaluated. Results Among the Scr-based equations, the Japanese Society of Nephrology-Chronic Kidney Disease Initiatives (JSN-CKDI) equation had the best overall performance with a bias of??6.2 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , and 96.1% of its estimates were within 30% of the rGFR. For the CysC-based equations, the Filler equation had the best performance with a bias of??3.9 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , and 93.7% of its estimates were within 30% of the rGFR. Overall, the CysC-based equations showed better performance than the Scr-based equations. In addition, significant differences were observed between bias and gender and between bias and rGFR value in some equations, whereas transplantation time and immunosuppressive regimens were not correlated with the bias. Conclusion The JSN-CKDI equation provides the best estimation of the GFR equations, and the CysC-based equations performed better than the Scr-based equations in this population. Highlights ? In this work, we evaluated the performance of Scr- and CysC-based equations for GFR estimation in Chinese renal transplant recipients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of the GFR estimation equations in renal transplant recipients with a large population. ? Among all the equations included in our study, the Scr-based JSN-CKDI equation had the best estimation; the genetic and environmental similarities between Chinese and Japanese people may contribute to the current result. ? Our results were similar with several previous studies. These results supported the use of CysC-based GFR equations in renal transplant recipients. ? We observed that equations involving females generally had larger bias than those in males. Moreover, these differences were significant in the JSN-CKDI, Larsson, Rule, Hoek, and Filler equations. This finding may be attributed to the absence or inadequate gender calibration in these equations. ? In our research, similar results were observed that nearly all the equations have increased net biases when the GFR value is >60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , which indicates that GFR equations are not suited for renal transplant recipients whose GFR values are at high level.
机译:摘要背景目前,没有专用的方程来估算移植的肾脏的肾小球过滤速率(GFR)。本研究旨在比较中国肾移植受者中血清肌酐(SCR) - 和胱抑素C(Cysc)方程的性能。方法在本研究中共有252例稳定的肾移植受体。 99M TC-DTPA(RGFR)的等离子体清除用作参考标准。患者的SCR,CySC和RGFR在同一天测量。评估了偏差,精度,准确度(估计范围内的估计量,占RGFR的50%),以及8个SCR和5个CYSC EGFR方程的协议。还评估了影响准确性的因素。结果基于SCR的方程中,日本肾病 - 慢性肾疾病举措(JSN-CKDI)方程(JSN-CKDI)方程具有最佳的整体性能,偏差为6.2ml / min / 1.73 m 2,其估计的96.1%在RGFR的30%以内。对于基于CYSC的方程,填充方程具有最佳性能,具有3.9ml / min / 1.73m 2的偏差,其估计的93.7%在RGFR的30%以内。总的来说,基于CYSC的方程显示出比基于SCR的方程更好的性能。此外,在一些方程中的偏差和性别和偏差和RGFR值之间观察到显着差异,而移植时间和免疫抑制方案与偏差不相关。结论JSN-CKDI方程提供了GFR方程的最佳估计,并且基于CYSC的方程比该群体中的基于SCR的方程更好。强调 ?在这项工作中,我们评估了中国肾移植接收者GFR估计的基于SCR和Cysc的方程的性能。据我们所知,这是肾移植受者的GFR估计方程的第一次评价,具有大群。还是在我们研究中包含的所有方程中,基于SCR的JSN-CKDI方程具有最佳估计;中国和日本人民之间的遗传和环境相似可能导致目前的结果。还是我们的结果与以前的几项研究相似。这些结果支持使用基于Cysc的GFR方程在肾移植受体中。还是我们观察到涉及女性的方程通常比男性的偏差更大。此外,这些差异在JSN-CKDI,Larsson,Rure,Hoek和填充方程中是显着的。该发现可能归因于这些方程中的性别校准缺失或不足。还是在我们的研究中,观察到类似的结果,当GFR值> 60ml / min / 1.73m 2时,几乎所有等式都有增加的净偏差,这表明GFR方程不适合其GFR值高的肾移植接受者等级。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transplantation Proceedings》 |2018年第1期|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Nuclear Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

    Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 器官移植术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号