...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Optimization of cord blood unit sterility testing: impact of dilution, analysis delay, and inhibitory substances
【24h】

Optimization of cord blood unit sterility testing: impact of dilution, analysis delay, and inhibitory substances

机译:脐带血单位无菌检测优化:稀释,分析延迟和抑制物质的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND Different methods are used by cord blood banks to prepare samples for sterility testing. Suboptimal methods can result in the release of contaminated products. In our organization, samples are prepared by diluting the final product in RPMI‐1640 medium. In this work, we have compared our method with different approaches to verify whether optimization should be sought. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Cord blood units (n?=?6 units per bacterial strain) characterized to contain inhibitory substances or not were inoculated (10 colony‐forming units/mL) with Streptococcus agalactiae , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Escherichia coli , or Bacteroides fragilis . After plasma and red blood cell removal, stem cell concentrates were diluted in RPMI‐1640, thioglycollate, or the unit's plasma. These products, as well as final product, plasma, and red blood cell fractions, were held from 0 to 72 hours at 20 to 24°C before inoculation in culture bottles and detection using the BacT/ALERT 3D system. RESULTS Dilution of cell concentrates in RPMI‐1640 allowed bacterial detection in 93.3% of noninhibitory cord blood samples after a 24‐hour storage period. Thioglycollate medium better promoted bacterial growth in inhibitory cord blood samples that were held for 72 hours before testing (66.7%) compared with RPMI‐1640 (45.0%). Less than 33% of all spiked plasma samples were detected by the BacT/ALERT 3D system. CONCLUSION Diluting cord blood samples in culture medium containing bacterial growth promoting substances is a suitable option for sterility testing, whereas the use of plasma should be proscribed, because it might lead to false‐negative results. Because inhibitory substances affect bacterial growth, inoculation of culture bottles should be done rapidly after sample preparation.
机译:背景技术脐带血库使用不同的方法,以制备用于无菌测试的样品。次优方法可导致污染产品的释放。在本组织中,通过在RPMI-1640培养基中稀释最终产品来制备样品。在这项工作中,我们将我们的方法与不同的方法进行了比较,以验证是否应该寻求优化。研究设计和方法表征脐带血单位(每种细菌菌株的N?6个单位),其特征在于含有抑制物质或未接种(10个形成单位/ ml)与链球菌,葡萄球菌,葡萄球菌,肺炎塞氏菌,大肠杆菌或Bracteroides fragilis。在血浆和红细胞移除后,干细胞浓缩物在RPMI-1640,硫代糖醇或单位的血浆中稀释。这些产品以及最终产品,血浆和红细胞级分在20至24℃下在培养瓶中接种并使用Bact / Alert 3D系统进行检测。结果在24小时储存期后,RPMI-1640中细胞浓缩物的稀释剂允许细菌检测在93.3%的非抑制脐带血样品中。硫代糖酸盐中等促进抑制脐带血液样品中的细菌生长,与RPMI-1640(45.0%)相比,在测试前保持72小时(66.7%)。 Bact / ALERT 3D系统检测到少于33%的所有尖刺等离子体样品。结论含有细菌生长物质的培养基中稀释脐带血样品是无菌检测的合适选择,而应禁止使用等离子体,因为它可能导致假阴性结果。由于抑制性物质影响细菌生长,所以在样品制备后应迅速接种培养瓶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号