首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Impact of one‐time testing for Trypanosoma cruzi Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies among blood donors in the United States
【24h】

Impact of one‐time testing for Trypanosoma cruzi Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies among blood donors in the United States

机译:一次性测试对美国献血者血糖瘤瘤瘤瘤瘤Cruzi抗体的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND US blood donors are tested for Trypanosoma cru z i antibodies only at their first presentation, based on studies, reviewed here, demonstrating the absence of incident infections. Reports of autochthonous human transmissions of the parasite in Texas have raised concern about the safety of one‐time testing. METHODS Positive donation frequencies were evaluated among first‐time blood donations from 2007 to 2015. Rates and their temporal changes were evaluated in an area of high T. cruzi infection and compared with rates elsewhere. Donors with positive results were surveyed for risk factors and relevant demographic characteristics. RESULTS Data from 9.1 million first‐time donations were analyzed; 585 (1:15,544) were confirmed positive by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) or concordantly positive with a second screening test/licensed assay. Seroprevalence in first‐time donors in Southern California (an area of high endemicity) was 1:2,747, or 5.7‐fold higher than the overall rate. Rates did not change over time nationally but showed a nonsignificant consistent downward trend in Southern California. The majority (92%) of donors who responded to a questionnaire had one or more T. cruzi endemic‐area risk factors. Five donors with likely autochthonous infection were identified (2007–2013); nine additional donors had RIPA false positivity. CONCLUSION T. cruzi seroprevalence among donors nationally and in an area of high enzootic infection were stable or declining. Almost all interviewed seropositive donors had known risk factors indicating likely infection years earlier while residing in T. cruzi –endemic areas. In the United States, there was no evidence of increased T. cruzi prevalence among first‐time donors.
机译:背景技术美国血液供体仅在其第一次介绍的基于研究的第一次介绍,证明没有事故感染的研究。德克萨斯州寄生虫的自身加重人类传播报告提出了对一次性测试的安全性的关注。方法在2007年至2015年的第一次献血中评价阳性捐赠频率。评估率和它们的时间变化在高T.Cruzi感染的区域中评估,并与其他地方的速率进行了比较。患有阳性结果的捐助者被调查用于风险因素和相关人口特征。结果分析了910万初期捐款的数据;通过放射免疫沉淀测定(RIPA)确认阳性585(1:15,544),或者通过第二筛选试验/许可测定进行一次阳性阳性。加利福尼亚州南部的首次捐助者(高流行度面积)的Seroprevalence为1:2,747,或比总体速率高5.7倍。利率在全国范围内没有改变,但在加州南部展示了一系列无情的下行趋势。对调查问卷的大多数(92%)捐助者有一个或多个T.Cruzi流行区域风险因素。鉴定了五种具有含可自加密感染的供体(2007-2013);九个额外的捐助者有RIPA假阳性。结论捐助者在全国性和高兴奋性感染领域的T.Cruzi Seroprengence稳定或下降。几乎所有采访的血清阳性捐赠者都有知名的风险因素,表明可能在居住在T.Cruzi andemisim领域的感染年份。在美国,没有证据表明,首次捐赠者之间的克鲁齐普遍存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号