...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Co-stimulation modulation with abatacept in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
【24h】

Co-stimulation modulation with abatacept in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机译:近期发病型糖尿病患者的共同刺激调节:随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The immunopathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus is associated with T-cell autoimmunity. To be fully active, immune T cells need a co-stimulatory signal in addition to the main antigen-driven signal. Abatacept modulates co-stimulation and prevents full T-cell activation. We evaluated the effect of abatacept in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 6-45 years recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive abatacept (10 mg/kg, maximum 1000 mg per dose) or placebo infusions intravenously on days 1, 14, 28, and monthly for a total of 27 infusions over 2 years. Computer-generated permuted block randomisation was used, with a block size of 3 and stratified by participating site. Neither patients nor research personnel were aware of treatment assignments. The primary outcome was baseline-adjusted geometric mean 2-h area-under-the-curve (AUC) serum C-peptide concentration after a mixed-meal tolerance test at 2 years' follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat for all patients for whom data were available. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00505375. FINDINGS: 112 patients were assigned to treatment groups (77 abatacept, 35 placebo). Adjusted C-peptide AUC was 59% (95% CI 6.1-112) higher at 2 years with abatacept (n=73, 0.378 nmol/L) than with placebo (n=30, 0.238 nmol/L; p=0.0029). The difference between groups was present throughout the trial, with an estimated 9.6 months' delay (95% CI 3.47-15.6) in C-peptide reduction with abatacept. There were few infusion-related adverse events (36 reactions occurred in 17 [22%] patients on abatacept and 11 reactions in six [17%] on placebo). There was no increase in infections (32 [42%] patients on abatacept vs 15 [43%] on placebo) or neutropenia (seven [9%] vs five [14%]). INTERPRETATION: Co-stimulation modulation with abatacept slowed reduction in beta-cell function over 2 years. The beneficial effect suggests that T-cell activation still occurs around the time of clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Yet, despite continued administration of abatacept over 24 months, the decrease in beta-cell function with abatacept was parallel to that with placebo after 6 months of treatment, causing us to speculate that T-cell activation lessens with time. Further observation will establish whether the beneficial effect continues after cessation of abatacept infusions. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
机译:背景:1型糖尿病的免疫病理学与T细胞自身免疫有关。为了完全活跃,除了主要抗原驱动信号之外,免疫T细胞还需要共刺激信号。 Abatacept调节共刺激并防止全T细胞活化。我们评估了AbataCept在近期发作1型糖尿病中的作用。方法:在这种多期式,双盲,随机对照试验中,6-45岁以下患者最近被诊断为1型糖尿病患者(2:1)接受Abatacept(10mg / kg,每剂量最大1000 mg)或安慰剂输注在第1,14,28天静脉内输注,每月均为27次输注超过2年。使用计算机生成的允许块随机化,其块大小为3,并通过参与部位分层。患者和研究人员都没有意识到治疗任务。在2年后的混合膳食耐受试验后,主要结果是基线调整的几何平均2-H区域下曲线(AUC)血清C-肽浓度。分析是为了治疗所有可用数据的患者。该试验在ClincinalTrials.gov注册,NCT00505375。结果:112名患者被分配给治疗组(77 Abatacept,35个安慰剂)。调整后的C-肽AUC为59%(95%CI 6.1-112),2年含有比与安慰剂(n = 30,0.238nmol / L; P = 0.0029)的2岁(N = 73,0.378 Nmol / L)更高。在整个试验期间存在群体之间的差异,估计有9.6个月的延迟(95%CI 3.47-15.6),C-肽减少与ABATACEPT。含有含有的输液相关的不良事件(在17例[22%]患者中发生36例反应,在安慰剂上的六[17%]中的11例反应)。感染没有增加(32%的Abatacept Vs 15 [43%]在安慰剂上)或中性粒细胞病(7 [9%] Vs五[14%])。解释:在2年内减少β细胞功能的共刺激调节减缓。有益效果表明T细胞活化仍然发生在1型糖尿病患者的临床诊断时。然而,尽管持续24个月持续掌握了ABATACEPT,但β-细胞功能的降低与ABATACEPT的β细胞功能平行于安慰剂治疗后的安慰剂,导致我们推测T细胞活化随时间减少。进一步的观察将建立在停止释放输注后是否继续有益效果。资金:美国国家健康研究院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号