首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials
【24h】

Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials

机译:治疗延迟,年龄和卒中严重程度对急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓效应的影响:随机试验中个体患者数据的META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Alteplase is effective for treatment of acute ischaemic stroke but debate continues about its use after longer times since stroke onset, in older patients, and among patients who have had the least or most severe strokes. We assessed the role of these factors in affecting good stroke outcome in patients given alteplase. Methods We did a pre-specified meta-analysis of individual patient data from 6756 patients in nine randomised trials comparing alteplase with placebo or open control. We included all completed randomised phase 3 trials of intravenous alteplase for treatment of acute ischaemic stroke for which data were available. Retrospective checks confirmed that no eligible trials had been omitted. We defined a good stroke outcome as no significant disability at 3-6 months, defined by a modified Rankin Score of 0 or 1. Additional outcomes included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (defined by type 2 parenchymal haemorrhage within 7 days and, separately, by the SITS-MOST definition of parenchymal type 2 haemorrhage within 36 h), fatal intracranial haemorrhage within 7 days, and 90-day mortality. Findings Alteplase increased the odds of a good stroke outcome, with earlier treatment associated with bigger proportional benefit. Treatment within 3·0 h resulted in a good outcome for 259 (32·9%) of 787 patients who received alteplase versus 176 (23·1%) of 762 who received control (OR 1·75, 95% CI 1·35-2·27); delay of greater than 3·0 h, up to 4·5 h, resulted in good outcome for 485 (35·3%) of 1375 versus 432 (30·1%) of 1437 (OR 1·26, 95% CI 1·05-1·51); and delay of more than 4·5 h resulted in good outcome for 401 (32·6%) of 1229 versus 357 (30·6%) of 1166 (OR 1·15, 95% CI 0·95-1·40). Proportional treatment benefits were similar irrespective of age or stroke severity. Alteplase significantly increased the odds of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (type 2 parenchymal haemorrhage definition 231 [6·8%] of 3391 vs 44 [1·3%] of 3365, OR 5·55, 95% CI 4·01-7·70, p<0·0001; SITS-MOST definition 124 [3·7%] vs 19 [0·6%], OR 6·67, 95% CI 4·11-10·84, p<0·0001) and of fatal intracranial haemorrhage within 7 days (91 [2·7%] vs 13 [0·4%]; OR 7·14, 95% CI 3·98-12·79, p<0·0001). The relative increase in fatal intracranial haemorrhage from alteplase was similar irrespective of treatment delay, age, or stroke severity, but the absolute excess risk attributable to alteplase was bigger among patients who had more severe strokes. There was no excess in other early causes of death and no significant effect on later causes of death. Consequently, mortality at 90 days was 608 (17·9%) in the alteplase group versus 556 (16·5%) in the control group (hazard ratio 1·11, 95% CI 0·99-1·25, p=0·07). Taken together, therefore, despite an average absolute increased risk of early death from intracranial haemorrhage of about 2%, by 3-6 months this risk was offset by an average absolute increase in disability-free survival of about 10% for patients treated within 3·0 h and about 5% for patients treated after 3·0 h, up to 4·5 h. Interpretation Irrespective of age or stroke severity, and despite an increased risk of fatal intracranial haemorrhage during the first few days after treatment, alteplase significantly improves the overall odds of a good stroke outcome when delivered within 4·5 h of stroke onset, with earlier treatment associated with bigger proportional benefits. Funding UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, University of Glasgow, University of Edinburgh.
机译:背景技术Alteplase对治疗急性缺血性卒中是有效的,但在较长的患者和具有最小或最严重的卒中的患者中,争论较延长的次数延长。我们评估了这些因素在患有Alteplase患者的良好中风结果时的作用。方法我们对九个随机试验中的6756名患者进行了预先指定的荟萃分析,其九次随机试验与安慰剂或开放控制的Alteplase进行了比较。我们包括所有已完成的随机阶段3静脉内膜试验,用于治疗可用数据的急性缺血性卒中。回顾性检查证实,没有省略合格的试验。我们将良好的中风结果定义为3-6个月内没有显着的残疾,由修改的Rankin得分为0或1。额外的结果包括症状颅内出血(由7天内的2型实质血液定义,分别通过坐姿 - 在36小时内进行实质2型出血的定义,致命颅内出血7天内,90天死亡率。结果Alteplase增加了良好的中风结果的几率,早期治疗与更大的比例效益相关。在3·0 h以内的治疗导致259名(32·9%)的787名患者的良好结果,接受了Alteplase的762名(23·1%)为762名接受控制(或1·75,95%Ci 1·35 -2·27);延迟大于3·0 h,高达4·5 h,导致485(35·3%)的1375(35·3%)为1437(或1·26,95%CI 1 ·05-1·51);超过4·5 h的延迟导致了401(32·6%)1229的良好结果,而357(或1·15,95%CI 0·95-1·40) 。与年龄或中风严重程度无关,比例治疗益处相似。 Alteplase显着提高了症状颅内出血的几率(2型实质出血定义231 [6·8%] 3391 vs 44 [1·3%]的3365,或5·55,95%CI 4·01-7·70 ,P <0·0001;坐部 - 最多的定义124 [3·7%] Vs 19 [0·6%],或6·67,95%CI 4·11-10·84,P <0·0001)和致命的颅内出血7天内(91 [2·7%] Vs 13 [0·4%];或7·14,95%CI 3·98-12·79,P <0·0001)。来自Alteplase的致命颅内出血的相对增加与治疗延迟,年龄或卒中严重程度相似,但患有更严重的卒中患者的患者较大的绝对过度的风险较大。其他早期死因没有过量的死因,对后来的死亡原因没有显着影响。因此,90天的死亡率为对照组的半普酶组中的608(17·9%)(危险比1·11,95%CI 0·99-1·25,P = 0·07)。因此,尽管颅内出血的预期死亡的平均危险程度约为2%,但在3-6个月内,患者在3中治疗的患者的患者的平均绝对增加约10%的患者的平均绝对增加,抵消了3-6个月·0小时和约5%的患者治疗3·0 H后,高达4·5小时。不论年龄或中风严重程度如何,尽管在治疗后的前几天致命的颅内出血风险增加,但随着早期治疗,Alteplase显着提高了良好的中风结果的总体几率与更大的比例福利有关。 Edinburgh大学格拉斯哥大学英国心脏基金会资助英国医学研究委员会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Lancet》 |2014年第9958期|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Population Clinical Trial Service Unit University of Oxford Old Road Campus;

    University of GlasgowGlasgow United Kingdom;

    Department of Neurology Cedars-SinaiLos Angeles CA United States;

    Department of Population Clinical Trial Service Unit University of Oxford Old Road Campus;

    Stanford UniversityStanford CA United States;

    Boehringer IngelheimIngelheim Germany;

    Mayo ClinicJacksonville FL United States;

    University of EdinburghEdinburgh United Kingdom;

    University of MelbourneMelbourne VIC Australia;

    Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental HealthMelbourne VIC Australia;

    University of Texas Health Science CenterHouston TX United States;

    University of AlabamaBirmingham AL United States;

    Helsinki University Central HospitalHelsinki Finland;

    National Cerebral and Cardiovascular CentreSuita Japan;

    Technische UniversityDresden Germany;

    Stanford UniversityStanford CA United States;

    George Institute for Global Health University of SydneySydney NSW Australia;

    University of EdinburghEdinburgh United Kingdom;

    Stanford UniversityStanford CA United States;

    University of NewcastleNewcastle NSW Australia;

    University of Texas Health Science CenterHouston TX United States;

    Sapienza UniversityRome Italy;

    National Cerebral and Cardiovascular CentreSuita Japan;

    Karolinska Institutet Clinical NeuroscienceStockholm Sweden;

    University of EdinburghEdinburgh United Kingdom;

    University of EdinburghEdinburgh United Kingdom;

    University of WashingtonSeattle WA United States;

    Department of Population Clinical Trial Service Unit University of Oxford Old Road Campus;

    University of EdinburghEdinburgh United Kingdom;

    University of HeidelbergHeidelberg Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号