...
首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Step-up therapy for children with uncontrolled asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids.
【24h】

Step-up therapy for children with uncontrolled asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

机译:升级治疗儿童接受吸入皮质类固醇的不受控制的哮喘。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: For children who have uncontrolled asthma despite the use of low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), evidence to guide step-up therapy is lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned 182 children (6 to 17 years of age), who had uncontrolled asthma while receiving 100 microg of fluticasone twice daily, to receive each of three blinded step-up therapies in random order for 16 weeks: 250 microg of fluticasone twice daily (ICS step-up), 100 microg of fluticasone plus 50 microg of a long-acting beta-agonist twice daily (LABA step-up), or 100 microg of fluticasone twice daily plus 5 or 10 mg of a leukotriene-receptor antagonist daily (LTRA step-up). We used a triple-crossover design and a composite of three outcomes (exacerbations, asthma-control days, and the forced expiratory volume in 1 second) to determine whether the frequency of a differential response to the step-up regimens was more than 25%. RESULTS: A differential response occurred in 161 of 165 patients who were evaluated (P<0.001). The response to LABA step-up therapy was most likely to be the best response, as compared with responses to LTRA step-up (relative probability, 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.3; P=0.004) and ICS step-up (relative probability, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.4; P=0.002). Higher scores on the Asthma Control Test before randomization (indicating better control at baseline) predicted a better response to LABA step-up (P=0.009). White race predicted a better response to LABA step-up, whereas black patients were least likely to have a best response to LTRA step-up (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all the children had a differential response to each step-up therapy. LABA step-up was significantly more likely to provide the best response than either ICS or LTRA step-up. However, many children had a best response to ICS or LTRA step-up therapy, highlighting the need to regularly monitor and appropriately adjust each child's asthma therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00395304.)
机译:背景:对于具有不受控制的哮喘的儿童尽管使用低剂量吸入皮质类固醇(IC),缺乏引导升压治疗的证据。方法:我们随机分配了182名儿童(6至17岁),他在每天两次接受100微米的氟辛酮的同时,在随机顺序接受100微米的散发疗法,持续16周:250微孔每日两次(ICS升级),100微米的氟酮加上每天两次(Laba Step-Up)的50微克,每天两次,或每日两次氟丙酮加5或10mg白酮受体每日拮抗剂(LTRA升级)。我们使用三跨越设计和三种结果的综合(加剧,哮喘控制天和强制呼气量,在1秒内),以确定对升压方案的差异响应的频率是否超过25% 。结果:评估165名患者的161名(P <0.001)中发生差分反应。与LTRA升压的反应相比,对Laba升压治疗的反应最有可能是最佳反应(相对概率,1.6; 95%置信区间[CI],1.1至2.3; P = 0.004)和IC升级(相对概率,1.7; 95%CI,1.2至2.4; p = 0.002)。随机化之前的哮喘控制测试(表明在基线上的更好控制)预测对Laba升压的更好响应(P = 0.009)。白种赛伐预测Laba升级更好地反应,而黑色患者最不可能对LTRA升级具有最佳反应(p = 0.005)。结论:几乎所有的孩子对每个升压治疗都有差异反应。 Laba Step-Up更有可能提供比IC或LTRA升级的最佳响应。然而,许多儿童对ICS或LTRA升级治疗具有最佳反应,突出了定期监测并适当调整每个孩子的哮喘治疗的需要。 (ClinicalTrials.gov号码,NCT00395304。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号