首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Comparison of Elastic and Rigid Registration during Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Multi-Operator Phantom Study
【24h】

Comparison of Elastic and Rigid Registration during Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Multi-Operator Phantom Study

机译:磁共振成像中弹性和刚性注册的比较/超声融合引导前列腺活检:多运营商幻影研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeThe relative value of rigid or elastic registration during magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy has been poorly studied. We compared registration errors (the distance between a region of interest and fiducial markers) between rigid and elastic registration during fusion guided prostate biopsy using a prostate phantom model. Materials and MethodsFour gold fiducial markers visible on magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound were placed throughout 1 phantom prostate model. The phantom underwent magnetic resonance imaging and the fiducial markers were labeled as regions of interest. An experienced user and a novice user of fusion guided prostate biopsy targeted regions of interest and then the corresponding fiducial markers on ultrasound after rigid and then elastic registration. Registration errors were compared. ResultsA total of 224 registration error measurements were recorded. Overall elastic registration did not provide significantly improved registration error over rigid registration (mean ± SD 4.87 ± 3.50 vs 4.11 ± 2.09 mm, p = 0.05). However, lesions near the edge of the phantom showed increased registration errors when using elastic registration (5.70 ± 3.43 vs 3.23 ± 1.68 mm, p = 0.03). Compared to the novice user the experienced user reported decreased registration error with rigid registration (3.25 ± 1.49 vs 4.98 ± 2.10 mm, p <0.01) and elastic registration (3.94 ± 2.61 vs 6.07 ± 4.16 mm, p <0.01). ConclusionsWe found no difference in registration errors between rigid and elastic registration overall but rigid registration decreased the registration error of targets near the prostate edge. Additionally, operator experience reduced registration errors regardless of the registration method. Therefore, elastic registration algorithms cannot serve as a replacement for attention to detail during the registration process and anatomical landmarks indicating accurate registration when beginning the procedure and before targeting each region of interest.
机译:在磁共振成像/超声融合引导前列腺活检期间的刚性或弹性配准的刚性或弹性配准的相对值已经研究得很差。我们比较了使用前列腺幻影模型的融合引导前列腺活组织检查期间刚性和弹性登记之间的登记误差(感兴趣的区域之间的距离)。在磁共振成像和超声波上可见的金色基准标记的材料和方法被置于1个幻想前列腺模型。 Phantom接受磁共振成像和基准标记被标记为感兴趣的区域。经验丰富的用户和融合的新手用户的融合前列腺活组织检查靶向区域的目标区域,然后在刚性的超声波后对相应的基准标记,然后弹性配准。比较注册错误。结果记录了224个注册误差测量的结果。整体弹性注册没有提供刚性注册的显着改善的注册误差(平均值±SD 4.87±3.50 Vs 4.11±2.09 mm,P = 0.05)。然而,在使用弹性配准时,幻像边缘附近的病变显示出增加的登记误差(5.70±3.43 Vs 3.23±1.68 mm,P = 0.03)。与新手用户相比,经验丰富的用户报告了刚性登记的登记误差减少(3.25±1.49 Vs 4.98±2.10 mm,P <0.01)和弹性注册(3.94±2.61 Vs 6.07±4.16mm,P <0.01)。结论我们发现刚性和弹性登记之间的登记误差差异,但刚性登记减少了前列腺边缘附近目标的登记误差。另外,操作员经历减少登记错误,无论登记方法如何。因此,弹性登记算法不能用作注册过程和解剖地标在注册过程和解剖地标期间注重细节的替代品,指示程序准确登记,然后在瞄准每个感兴趣区域之前。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号