...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3+4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance
【24h】

Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3+4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance

机译:有利风险危险的病理和肿瘤结果的比较Glason评分3 + 4,低风险Glason得分6前列腺癌:主动监测的考虑因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: Recent NCCN (R) (National Comprehensive Cancer Network (R)) Guidelines (R) show that patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4/Grade Group 2 but otherwise favorable features are active surveillance candidates. However, little is known about the long-term outcomes compared to that in men in the low risk Gleason score 6/Grade Group 1 group. We sought to clarify the risk of adverse features and oncologic outcomes in surgically treated, favorable Grade Group 2 vs 1 cases.
机译:目的:最近的NCCN(R)(国家综合癌症网络(R))指南(R)表明活检GLEASOSES的患者得分3 + 4 /级组2,但其他有利的功能是活跃监测候选者。 然而,与长期结果相比,与男性在低风险的男性中少见的是6 /级1组。 我们试图澄清手术治疗的不利特征和肿瘤结果的风险,良好的级组与1例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号