首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of pediatrics >Healthier Choices in School Cafeterias: A Systematic Review of Cafeteria Interventions
【24h】

Healthier Choices in School Cafeterias: A Systematic Review of Cafeteria Interventions

机译:学校食堂的更健康选择:对自助餐厅的干预措施进行系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveTo describe school cafeteria interventions in terms of a behavioral economics scheme and to assess which system is more likely to be effective in improving food selection or consumption. Study designWith this systematic review, we categorize cafeteria interventions using the behavioral economics theory of Kahneman into system 1 (fast and intuitive thinking) and system 2 (slow and cognitively demanding) or mixed (having elements of system 1 and system 2). Pertinent studies were identified from review of the literature of interventions performed in school and cafeteria settings in children grades K-12 within the past 5 years (2012-2017) at time of search. ResultsIn all, 48 of 978 studies met inclusion criteria. By defining success as a 30% improvement in a desired outcome or statistically significant reduction in body mass index, 89% of system 1, 67% of mixed (had both system 1 and 2 elements), and only 33% of system 2 interventions were successful. ConclusionsThis review found successful system 1 type school cafeteria interventions to be more common than system 2 type interventions and system 2 type interventions are less effective than system 1.
机译:目的描述了学校食堂的干预措施在行为经济学的计划的条款,并评估该系统更可能有效地改善食物的选择或消费。研究designWith这个系统的审查,我们用卡尼曼的行为经济学理论应用到系统1(快和直觉思维)和系统2(慢和认知苛刻)或混合(具有系统1和2的元素)分类食堂干预。相关的研究,从学校和食堂设置在儿童等级K-12在搜索时过去5年(2012-2017)内进行干预的文献审查查明。 ResultsIn所有,978的48项研究符合纳入标准。通过定义成功作为在所希望的结果的30%的改善或在身体质量指数统计学显著减少,系统1的89%,混合67%(有两个系统1层2的元件),和只有33%的系统的2次干预是成功的。 ConclusionsThis审查发现成功的系统1型学校食堂的干预比系统2型干预和系统2型干预更常见的是比系统1事倍功半。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号