...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience >Neural Architecture of Selective Stopping Strategies: Distinct Brain Activity Patterns Are Associated with Attentional Capture But Not with Outright Stopping
【24h】

Neural Architecture of Selective Stopping Strategies: Distinct Brain Activity Patterns Are Associated with Attentional Capture But Not with Outright Stopping

机译:选择性停止策略的神经结构:明显的脑活动模式与注意力捕获有关,但没有直接停止

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In stimulus-selective stop-signal tasks, the salient stop signal needs attentional processing before genuine response inhibition is completed. Differential prefrontal involvement in attentional capture and response inhibition has been linked to the right inferior frontal junction (IFJ) and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), respectively. Recently, it has been suggested that stimulus-selective stopping may be accomplished by the following different strategies: individuals may selectively inhibit their response only upon detecting a stop signal (independent discriminate then stop strategy) or unselectively whenever detecting a stop or attentional capture signal (stop then discriminate strategy). Alternatively, the discrimination process of the critical signal (stop vs attentional capture signal) may interact with the go process (dependent discriminate then stop strategy). Those different strategies might differentially involve attention-and stopping-related processes that might be implemented by divergent neural networks. This should lead to divergent activation patterns and, if disregarded, interfere with analyses in neuroimaging studies. To clarify this crucial issue, we studied 87 human participants of both sexes during a stimulus-selective stop-signal task and performed strategy-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses. We found that, regardless of the strategy applied, outright stopping displayed indistinguishable brain activation patterns. However, during attentional capture different strategies resulted in divergent neural activation patterns with variable activation of right IFJ and bilateral VLPFC. In conclusion, the neural network involved in outright stopping is ubiquitous and independent of strategy, while different strategies impact on attention-related processes and underlying neural network usage. Strategic differences should therefore be taken into account particularly when studying attention-related processes in stimulus-selective stopping.
机译:在刺激选择的停止信号任务中,在正品响应抑制完成之前,突出的停止信号需要注意力处理。差异预称参与注意力捕获和反应抑制分别与右下方结(IFJ)和腹侧前额定皮层(VLPFC)有关。最近,已经建议通过以下不同的策略来实现刺激选择性停止:只有在检测到检测到停止或注意力捕获信号时,个体可以仅在检测到停止信号(独立区分然后停止策略)时选择性地抑制其响应。停止判断策略)。或者,临界信号的判别过程(STOP VS注意力捕获信号)可以与GO过程交互(从属区分然后停止策略)。这些不同的策略可能差异涉及可能由发散神经网络实施的关注和停止相关的流程。这应该导致发散的激活模式,如果忽略,则干扰神经影像学研究中的分析。为了澄清这一关键问题,我们在刺激选择性停止信号任务期间研究了87名性别的人类参与者,并进行了策略依赖性功能磁共振成像分析。我们发现,无论应用的策略如何,彻底停止显示难以区分的脑激活模式。然而,在注意力期间,捕获不同的策略导致具有右IFJ和双侧VLPFC的可变激活的不同策略。总之,涉及彻底停止的神经网络是无处不在的,与战略无处不在,而不同的策略对关注相关过程和潜在的神经网络使用产生不同的策略。因此,应特别考虑战略差异,特别是在刺激选择性停止中研究关注相关过程时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号