【24h】

From the archives

机译:来自档案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The question of establishing an automobile factory in India is .just a part of the general scheme of industrialising the country, and, if it is agreed that the development of all the available material resources of this great sub-continent is desirable and necessary for the promotion of the prosperity and the well-being of the Empire, it is inconceivable why the modest proposals for the inauguration of a motor factory in Bombay were discouraged. It will be remembered that in connection with framing the outline of the project, Sir M. Visvesvaraya had investigated the possibilities of this new venture in all its detail, by visiting a large number of automobile factories in Europe and America, and by consulting with their directors and technical experts. The report that he prepared after exhaustive enquiry, revealed the fact that practically all the experts consulted favoured the project, by offering active support and co-operation. It was a grave misfortune that, while the report was being sympathetically considered by the promoiers of the scheme, they appear to have been suddenly seized with a spirit of pessimism in respect of the success of the proposals formulated in the report, and that they were almost inclined to believe the misleading doctrine that India would do better to buy foreign motor vehicles than build them in her own factories. The establishment of a large industry, such as the one Sir M. Visvesvaraya was contemplating, must necessarily affect vested interests and must even provoke a certain measure of hostility, but what is puzzling is that the hard-headed business men, who take a practical and a long-range view of industrial concerns, should succumb to the blandishments of false and futile economic philosophy. In 1936, efforts were made to enlist the sympathy and the active support of the Government of Bombay and the Government of India. The Government' of India were profuse in their sympathy, but adhered to the policy of discriminating protection for Indian industries; enunciated by the Fiscal Commission of 1921-22 and in pursuance of this policy the Imperial Government could offer no assistance to 'an industry that was not started' and could therefore make no promise for the purchase of its products. The Congress Ministry, then in power in Bombay, however, offered provisionally a guarantee of 3 or 3.5 per cent interest on a capital issue of Rs 150 lakhs for the industry for a period of ten years. Before the concession could be finally sanctioned, the Congress Government went out of office....
机译:在印度建立汽车工厂的问题只是该国工业化总计划的一部分,如果同意,开发这个伟大的次大陆的所有可用物质资源对于印度来说是理想和必要的。为促进帝国的繁荣和福祉,为什么不鼓励在孟买开设汽车厂的谦虚建议遭到拒绝。我们会记得,在制定项目大纲时,维斯维瓦拉亚爵士(Mr. Visvesvaraya)曾到欧洲和美洲的许多汽车工厂,并向他们咨询过,详细研究了这项新企业的可能性。董事和技术专家。他在详尽询问之后编写的报告显示,事实上,所有专家咨询都通过提供积极的支持和合作来支持该项目。不幸的是,尽管该方案的发起人对报告给予了同情的考虑,但他们却突然对本报告中所提出的建议的成功抱有悲观的精神,并且他们是几乎倾向于相信这种误导性的论点,即印度比在自己的工厂中制造外国汽车要好得多,以购买外国汽车。建立大型工业,例如维斯韦瓦拉亚爵士(M. Visvesvaraya)爵士正在考虑的工业,必定会影响既得利益,甚至引发一定程度的敌意,但令人费解的是,头脑冷静的商人善于实践。以及对工业问题的长远看法,应该屈从于虚假和徒劳的经济哲学的荒诞。 1936年,努力争取孟买政府和印度政府的同情和积极支持。印度政府对此表示同情,但坚持歧视印度工业的政策。根据1921-22年财政委员会的说明,根据这项政策,帝国政府无法为“一个尚未起步的产业”提供任何援助,因此也不能保证购买其产品。但是,当时在孟买掌权的国会事务部临时为该行业提供了1,500万卢比的资本发行,为期十年,提供3%或3.5%的利息担保。在特许权最终获得批准之前,国会政府已经破产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号