首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Is Cryotherapy a Genuine Rival to Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy in the Management of Suspected Renal Malignancy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Is Cryotherapy a Genuine Rival to Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy in the Management of Suspected Renal Malignancy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:cryotherapy是否在疑似肾病的管理中对机器人辅助部分肾切除术进行了真正的竞争对手? 系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We systematically reviewed the world literature and compare oncological outcomes, morbidity, renal function, and perioperative outcome between cryotherapy and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for suspected renal malignancy. There was a statistically significant difference in “recurrence rates” between the 2 techniques, favoring the RAPN cohort. There was no statistically significant difference in overall and ≥Clavien 3a complication rates between the 2 techniques. The quality of evidence for recurrence rates, overall complication, and ≥Clavien 3a were “moderate”, “low,” and “very low,” respectively, on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. If a nephron sparing approach is indicated, RAPN should be the approach of choice.
机译:我们系统地审查了世界文献,并比较了冷冻疗法和机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)之间的肿瘤效果,发病率,肾功能和围手术期结果,可疑肾病恶性肿瘤。 2种技术之间的“复发率”差异有统计学意义,有利于Rapn Cohort。 在2种技术之间,总体上没有统计学上显着差异,≥Clavien3A并发症率。 复发率的证据质量,整体并发症和≥Clavien3A分别为“中等”,“低,”和“非常低”,分别(建议评估,发展和评估等级分级)方法。 如果指出了肾儿所备件方法,Rapn应该是选择的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号