...
首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in cardiology >Management of carotid disease in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: is it time to change our approach?
【24h】

Management of carotid disease in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: is it time to change our approach?

机译:接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者的颈动脉疾病管理:是时候改变我们的方法了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The management of concurrent severe carotid and coronary disease is a subject of ongoing debate in the absence of randomized clinical trials. Amidst the growing controversy, the clinician has to carefully tailor the best strategy for a given patient based on neurologic and cardiac symptoms. This review aims to compile current evidence in this area to help plan strategies for the optimal management of coexisting severe carotid and coronary disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Carotid revascularization with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or stenting (CAS) is frequently performed in conjunction with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in the United States for asymptomatic carotid disease. The risk of perioperative stroke with unilateral asymptomatic 70-99% carotid stenosis is likely small based on several observational data. Moreover, the risk associated with both staged and combined CEA-CABG procedures in the asymptomatic population may outweigh any benefit. Carotid artery stenting is an alternative option in patients with severe coronary disease who are considered 'high risk' for CEA. Neurologically symptomatic patients require carotid revascularization prior to or in conjunction with CABG surgery. Ultimately, the choice of carotid revascularization or conservative management will depend on clinical characteristics, anatomy, and local expertise. SUMMARY: Severe carotid disease in the CABG population is often unilateral and asymptomatic. Based on the available data, conservative carotid therapy in the low-risk asymptomatic individuals is likely the best treatment option. Carotid revascularization may be justified in symptomatic or high-risk patients such as those with contralateral carotid occlusion or bilateral severe stenosis.
机译:审查的目的:在缺乏随机临床试验的情况下,并发严重颈动脉和冠状动脉疾病的治疗是一个不断争论的话题。在越来越多的争议中,临床医生必须根据神经和心脏症状为特定患者精心制定最佳策略。这篇综述旨在汇编该领域的最新证据,以帮助制定策略,以优化管理并存的严重颈动脉和冠状动脉疾病。最新发现:在美国,无症状性颈动脉疾病经常与冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)结合进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或支架置入术(CAS)。根据一些观察数据,单侧无症状70-99%颈动脉狭窄的围手术期中风的风险可能很小。此外,在无症状人群中与分阶段和联合使用CEA-CABG程序相关的风险可能超过任何收益。对于被认为是CEA“高风险”的重度冠心病患者,颈动脉支架置入术是另一种选择。有神经系统症状的患者需要在CABG手术之前或与之结合进行颈动脉血运重建。最终,颈动脉血运重建或保守治疗的选择将取决于临床特征,解剖结构和当地专业知识。摘要:CABG人群中的严重颈动脉疾病通常是单方面的且无症状。根据现有数据,在低风险,无症状的个体中进行保守性颈动脉治疗可能是最佳的治疗选择。有症状或高危患者(如对侧颈动脉闭塞或双侧严重狭窄的患者)可能需要进行颈动脉血运重建。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号