...
首页> 外文期刊>Physical chemistry chemical physics: PCCP >Gravimetric tank method to evaluate material-enhanced hydrogen storage by physisorbing materials
【24h】

Gravimetric tank method to evaluate material-enhanced hydrogen storage by physisorbing materials

机译:重量罐方法通过物理吸收材料评估材料增强储氢

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The most common methods to evaluate hydrogen sorption (volumetric and gravimetric) require significant experience and expensive equipment for providing reproducible results. Both methods allow one to measure excess uptake values which are used to calculate the total amount of hydrogen stored inside of a tank as required for applications. Here we propose an easy to use and inexpensive alternative approach which allows one to evaluate directly the weight of hydrogen inside a material-filled test tank. The weight of the same tank filled with compressed hydrogen in the absence of loaded material is used as a reference. We argue that the only parameter which is of importance for hydrogen storage applications is by how much the material improves the total weight of hydrogen inside of the given volume compared to compressed gas. This parameter which we propose to name Gain includes both volumetric and gravimetric characterization of the material; it can be determined directly without knowing the skeletal volume of the material or excess sorption. The feasibility of the Gravimetric Tank (GT) method was tested using several common carbon and Metal Organic Framework (MOF) materials. The best Gain value of approximate to 12% was found for the Cu-BTC MOF which means that the tank completely filled with this material stores a 12% higher amount of hydrogen compared to H-2 gas at the same P-T conditions. The advantages of the GT method are its inexpensive design, extremely simple procedures and direct results in terms of tank capacity as required for industrial applications. The GT method could be proposed as a standard check for verification of the high hydrogen storage capacity of new materials. The GT method is expected to provide even better accuracy for evaluation of a material's performance for storage of denser gases like e.g. CO2 and CH4.
机译:评估氢吸附(体积和重量)的最常用方法需要重大经验和昂贵的设备,用于提供可重复的结果。两种方法都允许一个测量过量吸收值,用于根据需要计算储存在罐内的氢总量。在这里,我们提出了一种易于使用和廉价的替代方法,其允许人们直接评估填充材料填充的试验箱内的氢气的重量。在不存在加载材料的情况下填充有压缩氢的相同罐的重量用作参考。我们认为,与压缩气体相比,该材料对给定体积内的氢总重量提高了许多参数。我们提出名称增益的此参数包括材料的体积和重量表征;它可以直接确定而不知道材料的骨骼体积或过量吸附。使用几种普通碳和金属有机框架(MOF)材料测试重量罐(GT)方法的可行性。对于Cu-BTC MOF,发现了近似为12%的最佳增益值,这意味着与该材料完全填充的罐与相同的P-T条件相比,与H-2气体相比,储存量储存了12%氢气量。 GT方法的优点是其廉价设计,非常简单的程序,以及工业应用所需的罐容量方面的直接导致。 GT方法可以提出作为标准检查,以验证新材料的高储氢容量。 GT方法预计将提供更好的准确性,以评估材料的性能,以便如例如储存更密集气体。二氧化碳和ch4。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号