首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair after colorectal surgery. Is it possible to maintain a mini-invasive approach?
【24h】

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair after colorectal surgery. Is it possible to maintain a mini-invasive approach?

机译:腹腔镜切口疝修复在结肠直肠手术后。 是否有可能维持迷你侵入性的方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several benefits have been described in laparoscopic surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS). We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and the results of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair after LCRS. Between May 2001 and March 2014, all charts of consecutive patients who underwent LCRS and developed an incisional hernia were evaluated. Patients with parastomal hernias or those with less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded. Patients were assigned to laparoscopic repair group (LR) and open repair group (OR). Demographics, surgical factors, and 30-day postoperative complications were analyzed. The incisional ventral hernia rate was 7 % (90/1290), and 82 incisional hernia repairs were performed. In 49 patients (60 %) an open approach was performed, and there were 33 laparoscopic repairs (2 converted due to small bowel injury). Mean age was 62 years. Average body mass index was 27.4 +/- 5.2 kg/m(2). The mean defect size was 56 (4-527) cm(2), and there were no differences between the groups (LR: 49 cm(2) vs OR: 63 cm(2); p = NS). Average operative time was 107 (45-240) minutes (LR: 93 min vs OR: 116 min, p = 0.02). OR showed a higher rate of postoperative complications (OR: 51 % vs LR: 18 %, p = 0.003) and increased hospital stay (OR: 2.77 +/- 4 days vs LR: 0.7 +/- 0.4 days; p = 0.02). The recurrence rate was 15 % (12 patients, 6 each group; p = NS) after a follow-up of 48 (r: 6-141) months. Laparoscopic approach for incisional hernia repair after LCRS seems to be safe and feasible. Patients who received laparoscopic approach showed significantly less postoperative complications and shorter hospital staying. These observations suggest that mini-invasive surgery may be the initial approach in patients who develop an incisional hernia after LCRS.
机译:腹腔镜手术已经描述了几种益处。然而,腹腔镜结肠直肠手术(LCRS)后,缺乏关于切口疝的腹腔镜修复的证据。我们旨在评估LAPAROPOPIC疝修复的可行性和结果。 2001年5月至2014年3月,评估了所有接受LCR和开发切口疝的患者的所有图表。患有花瓶疝的患者或随访时间不到6个月的患者。患者被分配到腹腔镜修复组(LR)和开放修复组(或)。分析了人口统计,手术因素和30天的术后并发症。切口腹膜疝率为7%(90/1290),并进行82个切口疝修理。在49名患者中(60%)进行开放方法,并且存在33种腹腔镜修复(2次由于小肠损伤而转换)。平均年龄为62岁。平均体重指数为27.4 +/- 5.2 kg / m(2)。平均缺陷尺寸为56(4-527)cm(2),并且组之间没有差异(LR:49cm(2)Vs或:63cm(2); p = ns)。平均手术时间为107(45-240)分钟(LR:93 min Vs或:116分钟,P = 0.02)。或表现出更高的术后并发症率(或:51%VS:18%,P = 0.003)和住院住宿增加(或:2.77 +/- 4天与LR:0.7 +/- 0.4天; P = 0.02) 。在48(R:6-141)个月后,复发率为15%(12名患者,每组6例; P = NS)。 LCRS后切口疝修复的腹腔镜方法似乎是安全可行的。接受腹腔镜方法的患者显示出明显不太术后并发症和较短的医院住宿。这些观察结果表明,迷你侵入性手术可能是在LCRS后开发切口疝的患者的初始方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号