首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial

机译:单切口的短期结果加上腹腔镜与肠道镜癌的常规腹腔镜手术:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveThe objective of the study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port surgery (SILS+1) compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colonic cancer.BackgroundAt present, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy remains technically challenging. The use of SILS+1 as an alternative has gained increasing attention; however, its safety and efficacy remain controversial.Methods and patientsBetween April 2014 and July 2016, 198 patients with clinical stage T1-4aN0-2 M0 rectosigmoid cancer were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to either SILS+1 (n=99) or CLS (n=99). The morbidity and mortality within 30days, operative and pathologic outcomes, postoperative recovery course, inflammation and immune responses, and pain intensity were compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in overall complications between the two groups (17.2 vs. 16.3%, P=1.000). The total operating time for the SILS+1 group was significantly shorter (100.830.4 vs. 116.6 +/- 36.6, P=0.002). Blood loss was significantly greater in the CLS group (20 vs. 50, P<0.001). Thirteen patients (14%) in the CLS group required additional postoperative analgesics, which was significantly more than four patients in the SILS+1 group. Notably, on postoperative day three, the visual analogue scale score of the CLS group was greater than that of the SILS+1 group (1.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 1.3, P=0.023). Tumor diameter, pathologic stage, length of the proximal and distal margins, and number of lymph nodes harvested were similar, other values were also similar between the two groups.Conclusion Our findings suggest that SILS+1 might be safe and feasible for rectosigmoid cancer when performed by experienced surgeons. It offers minimal invasiveness without compromising oncologic treatment principles. Trial Registration This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02117557).
机译:该研究的目的是评估单切口加上单嘴术(SILS + 1)的短期结果与结肠癌的常规腹腔镜手术(CLS)。与表现出存在的单切口腹腔镜联合肌瘤仍然挑战。使用SILS + 1作为替代方案越来越受到关注;然而,它的安全性和疗效仍然存在争议。2014年4月和2016年4月患者,198例临床阶段T1-4An0-2 M0肠蠕素癌症患者进行了注册。将参与者随机分配给SILS + 1(n = 99)或CLS(n = 99)。 30天内,手术和病理结果的发病率和死亡率,术后恢复过程,炎症和免疫应答,以及疼痛强度。两组之间的整体并发症没有显着差异(17.2 vs.16.3%,P = 1.000) 。 SILS + 1组的总操作时间明显缩短(100.830.4与116.6 +/- 36.6,p = 0.002)。 CLS组(20 vs.50,P <0.001)中血液损失明显更大。 CLS组的十三名患者(14%)需要额外的术后镇痛药,其在SILS + 1组中具有明显超过4名患者。值得注意的是,在术后第三天,CLS组的视觉模拟比得分大于SILS + 1组(1.3 +/- 1.1,1.7 +/- 1.3,P = 0.023)。肿瘤直径,病理阶段,近端和远端边缘的长度以及收获的淋巴结数相似,两组之间也相似。结论我们的研究结果表明SILS + 1可能是安全可靠的矫直物癌由经验丰富的外科医生进行。它提供最小的侵犯性,而不会影响肿瘤治疗原则。试用注册此试验在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02117557)上注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号