首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Incisionless fluorescent cholangiography (IFC): a pilot survey of surgeons on procedural familiarity, practices, and perceptions
【24h】

Incisionless fluorescent cholangiography (IFC): a pilot survey of surgeons on procedural familiarity, practices, and perceptions

机译:未经未经未经卷发的荧光胆管造影(IFC):对程序熟悉,实践和看法的外科医生的试验调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Incisionless fluorescent cholangiography (IFC) has recently been proven feasible, safe, and efficacious as an intraoperative procedure to help identify extrahepatic bile ducts during laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC). We conducted a pilot survey of 51 surgeons attending an international conference who perform endoscopic cholecystectomies to identify their typical LC practices, and perceptions of IFC. Methods An international panel of ten IFC experts, all with > 500 prior IFC procedures and related research publications, convened during the 4th International Congress of Fluorescence-Guided Surgery in Boca Raton, Florida in February 2017. The panel was charged with developing questions about LC practices and experience with IFC, and perceptions regarding its advantages, barriers to use, and indications. These questions then were asked to other congress attendees during one of the didactic sessions using an online polling application. Attendees, who ranged from zero to considerable experience performing IFC, accessed the survey via their portable devices. Results Of the 51 survey participants, 51% were from North America; 77% identified themselves as general/minimally invasive surgeons, and roughly 60% performed under 50 cholecystectomies/year. Only 12% performed routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), while 72.3% routinely performed critical safety reviews. Thirty-five percent estimated that their institution's laparoscopic-to-open surgery conversion rate was > 1% during LC. Roughly 95% of respondents felt that surgeons should have access to a noninvasive method for evaluating extrahepatic biliary structures; 84% felt that the most advantageous characteristic of IFC is the lack of any biliary-tree incision; and 93.3% felt that IFC would have considerable educational value in surgical training programs; and 78% felt that any surgeon who performs LC could benefit. Conclusions Surgeons who participated in our survey overwhelmingly recommended the routine use of IFC during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a complimentary imaging technique. Prospective randomized clinical trials remain necessary to determine whether IFC reduces the incidence of bile duct injuries and other LC complications.
机译:背景无切口荧光造影(IFC)最近被证明可行,安全和有效的作为手术过程来帮助在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)确定肝外胆管。我们进行的51名外科医生主治谁进行内镜胆囊切除术,以确定他们的典型做法LC的国际会议试点调查,和IFC的看法。方法取IFC专家组成的国际小组,所有> 500个之前IFC程序和相关研究刊物,在2017年二月在佛罗里达州博卡拉顿的荧光引导手术的第四届国际大会期间召开的面板被指控与发展中国家有关的问题LC实践与经验的国际金融公司(IFC),和看法就其优势,利用障碍,并指示。这些问题然后分别使用在线投票应用说教的会议之一期间要求其他参加大会。与会者,谁介于零到执行IFC相当丰富的经验,通过他们的便携式设备访问调查。结果51名调查参与者中,有51%来自北美; 77%认为自己是一般/微创外科医生,并在50胆囊切除术/年进行60%左右。只有12%的执行例行术中胆道造影(IOC),而72.3%常规进行关键的安全审查。百分之三十五的估计,他们的机构的腹腔镜至开放性手术的转化率为> LC时1%。的受访者大致95%认为外科医生应能获得用于评估肝外胆道结构的非侵入性方法; 84%认为IFC的最有利的特征是缺乏任何胆树切口;而93.3%的人认为IFC将在外科培训规划相当的教育价值;而78%的人认为,任何外科医生谁执行LC可以从中受益。谁参与了我们的调查结论绝大多数外科医生建议腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为一个免费的成像技术在日常使用IFC的。前瞻性随机临床试验仍然是必要的,以确定是否IFC降低胆管损伤等LC并发症的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号