首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Third-time ('redo-redo') anti-reflux surgery: patient-reported outcomes after a thoracoabdominal approach
【24h】

Third-time ('redo-redo') anti-reflux surgery: patient-reported outcomes after a thoracoabdominal approach

机译:第三次(“重做重做”)抗反流手术:胸腹部方法后病人报告的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Approximately 3-6% of patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery require "redo" surgery for persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Further surgery for patients with two failed prior anti-reflux operations is controversial due to the morbidity of reoperation and poor outcomes. We examined our experience with surgical revision of patients with at least two failed anti-reflux operations. Methods Adults undergoing at least a second-time revision anti-reflux surgery between 1999 and 2017 were eligible. The primary outcomes were general and disease-specific quality-of-life (QoL) scores determined by Short-Form-36 (SF36) and GERD-Health-Related QoL (GERD-HRQL) instruments, respectively. Secondary outcomes included perioperative morbidity and mortality. Results Eighteen patients undergoing redo-redo surgery (13 with 2 prior operations, 5 with 3 prior operations) were followed for a median of 6 years [IQR 3, 12]. Sixteen patients (89%) underwent open revisions (14 thoracoabdominal, 2 laparotomy) and two patients had laparoscopic revisions. Indications for surgery included reflux (10 patients), regurgitation (5 patients), and dysphagia (3 patients). Intraoperative findings were mediastinal wrap herniation (9 patients), misplaced wrap (2 patients), mesh erosion (1 patient), or scarring/stricture (6 patients). Procedures performed included Collis gastroplasty + fundoplication (6 patients), redo fundoplication (5 patients), esophagogastrectomy (4 patients), and primary hiatal closure (3 patients). There were no deaths and 13/18 patients (72%) had no postoperative complications. Ten patients completed QoL surveys; 8 reported resolution of reflux, 6 reported resolution of regurgitation, while 4 remained on proton-pump inhibitors (PPI). Mean SF36 scores (+/- standard deviation) in the study cohort in the eight QoL domains were as follows: physical functioning (79.5 [+/- 19.9]), physical role limitations (52.5 [+/- 46.3]), emotional role limitations (83.3 [+/- 36.1]), vitality (60.0 [+/- 22.7]), emotional well-being (88.4 [+/- 8.7]), social functioning (75.2 [+/- 31.0]), pain (66.2 [+/- 30.9]), and general health (55.0 [+/- 39.0]). Conclusion An open thoracoabdominal approach in appropriately selected patients needing third-time anti-reflux surgery carries low morbidity and provides excellent results as reflected in QoL scores. Graphic abstract
机译:背景,约3-6%的抗反流手术患者需要“重做”手术治疗持续的胃食管反流疾病(GERD)。由于再运产和差的结果发病率,有两项失败的抗反动作业患者的进一步手术是争议的。我们审查了我们对至少两个失败的抗反动作业患者的手术修订的经验。方法在1999年至2017年期间至少进行二次修订抗反动手术的成年人符合条件。主要结果是一般性,疾病特异性寿命质量(QOL)分数分别由短型-66(SF36)和壮观的健康相关的QOL(GERD-HRQL)仪器确定。二次结果包括围手术期发病率和死亡率。结果18名接受重做手术的患者(13名以前的操作,5名以前的操作,3名以前的行动)进行了6年的中位数[IQR 3,12]。十六名患者(89%)接受开放修订(14名Thoracoabnaminal,2剖腹手术)和两名患者进行了腹腔镜修订。手术的适应症包括回流(10名患者),反流(5名患者)和吞咽症(3名患者)。术中发现是纵隔膜(9名患者),错位包装(2名患者),网眼侵蚀(1例),或瘢痕/狭窄(6例)。进行的程序包括Collis Gastorpasty + FoogOltication(6名患者),重做基础药用精神(5名患者),食管胃切除术(4名患者)和原发性胞质闭合(3名患者)。没有死亡,13/18名患者(72%)没有术后并发症。十名患者完成了QOL调查; 8报告的回流分辨率,6例报告的反流性分辨率,而4仍留在质子泵抑制剂(PPI)上。八个QOL结构域中的研究队列中的平均SF36分数(+/-标准偏差)如下:物理功能(79.5 [+/- 19.9]),物理角色限制(52.5 [+/- 46.3]),情绪作用限制(83.3 [+/- 36.1]),生命力(60.0 [+/- 22.7]),情绪福祉(88.4 [+/- 8.7]),社会功能(75.2 [+/- 31.0]),疼痛( 66.2 [+/- 30.9])和一般健康(55.0 [+/- 39.0])。 Conclusion An open thoracoabdominal approach in appropriately selected patients needing third-time anti-reflux surgery carries low morbidity and provides excellent results as reflected in QoL scores.图形摘要

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号