首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Early versus late stabilization of the spine in the polytrauma patient.
【24h】

Early versus late stabilization of the spine in the polytrauma patient.

机译:早期与多重脊柱的后期稳定稳定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early spinal stabilization in the multiple trauma patient is safe and does not increase morbidity or mortality. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no consensus regarding the timing of surgical stabilization of the injured spine, especially in patients with multiple trauma. Designing and performing randomized clinical trials to evaluate early versus late surgery is difficult. METHODS: Between January 1990 and July 2009, a computer-aided search using the keywords Spine or Spinal, Trauma, Spinal Cord Injury, and Surgery was done that included MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ACP Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and PsychLit. Articles dealing only with neurologic improvement that did not mention other non-neurologic factors that were affected by early surgery were excluded. The authors selected and assessed the studies to be included in the analysis. An unblinded assessment of the quality of the study was done using the Gradeing of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rank each article for its relevance to the topic. RESULTS: Eleven articles directly comparing 2 cohorts that had early or late surgery were identified. All of the studies evaluated consistently demonstrated shorter hospital and intensive care unit length of stays, fewer days on mechanical ventilation, and lower pulmonary complications in patients who are treated with early spine decompression and stabilization. These advantages are more marked in patients with polytrauma. Data regarding morbidity and mortality rates are more variable. CONCLUSION: There is strong evidence within the literature that early surgical stabilization consistently leads to shorter hospital stays, shorter intensive care unit stays, less days on mechanical ventilation, and lower pulmonary complications. This effect is more evident in patients who have more severe injuries as measured by Injury Severity Score. This benefit is seen in both, spinal cord injured and noncord-injured patients. There is also some evidence that early stabilization does not increase the complication rates compared to late surgery.
机译:研究设计:系统评价。目的:判断多个创伤患者早期脊柱稳定是否是安全的,不会增加发病率或死亡率。背景数据摘要:对受伤脊柱的手术稳定的时序没有共识,特别是在多个创伤患者中。设计和表演随机临床试验来评估早期与晚期手术难以。方法:1990年1月至2009年7月,采用关键词脊柱或脊柱,创伤,脊髓损伤和手术进行了计算机辅助搜索,包括Medline,Embase,Healthstar,累积指数给护理和联盟健康文献,Cochrane数据库系统评价,ACP期刊俱乐部,效果摘要摘要数据库,Cochrane中央登记术,对照试验,Psycinfo和Psychlit。除了没有提到受早期手术影响的其他非神经系统因素的神经系统改善的文章被排除在外。作者选择并评估了在分析中包含的研究。使用成绩,评估,开发和评估方法的成绩来完成对该研究质量的盲目评估,以便为每篇文章进行排名,以便与该主题的相关性。结果:鉴定了11个直接比较有早期或晚期手术的队列的一篇文章。所有研究始终如一地表现出较短的医院和重症监护单位的住宿时间,机械通气的日期较少,患有早期脊柱减压和稳定性的患者患者的肺部并发症。多种多特兰患者患者更具标记。关于发病率和死亡率的数据更具变量。结论:在文献中有强有力的证据,早期手术稳定一直导致较短的医院住宿,更短的重症监护室住宿,机械通气的日子较少,肺部并发症降低。这种效果更明显,患者受到伤害严重程度得分更严重的伤害。脊髓损伤和非公共伤害患者都可以看到这种益处。还有一些证据表明,与晚期手术相比,早期稳定性不会增加并发症率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号