首页> 外文期刊>Spine >The urgency of surgical decompression in acute central cord injuries with spondylosis and without instability.
【24h】

The urgency of surgical decompression in acute central cord injuries with spondylosis and without instability.

机译:脊髓型急性中央脐带损伤手术减压的紧迫性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review, ambispective analysis of observational data. OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations as to whether or not urgent surgical decompression is ever indicated as the optimal treatment for enhancing neurologic recovery in a patient with acute central cord injury without fracture or instability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are currently no standards regarding the role and timing of decompression in acute traumatic central cord syndrome. In the setting of TCCS without spinal column instability, much controversy exists. METHODS: We have performed a thorough literature search based on the following question: "Is there a role for urgent (within 24 hours from injury to surgery) surgical decompression in acute central cord syndrome without fracture or instability specifically to enhance neurologic recovery?" Data including patient demographics, mechanism of injury, comorbidities, neurologic status, and surgical treatment was analyzed from a multicenter STSG observational database. Outcome measured included ASIA Motor Score, ASIA Grade, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Score, SF-36, Sphincter Disturbance, and Ambulatory status. Measures were recorded on admission, discharge, 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, early surgery resulted in a 6.31 point greater improvement in total motor score than did the late surgery group, with a P = 0.0358. At 6-month follow-up, early surgery result in higher chance of improvement in ASIA Grade than late surgery, with an odds ratio = 3.39, while at 12-month follow-up early surgery resulted in a higher chance of improvement in ASIA Grade, with an odds ratio of 2.81. Patients who were operated on within 24 hours had 7.79 U more improvement in FIM Total Score than late surgery at 6 month follow-up, with P = 0.0474. CONCLUSION: The consensus of experts following review of relevant and examination of observational dataset concluded that it is reasonable and safe to consider early surgical decompression in patients with profound neurologic deficit (ASIA = C) and persistent spinal cord compression due to developmental cervical spinal canal stenosis without fracture or instability. Those with less severe deficit (ASIA = D) can be treated with initial observation with surgery potentially at a later date depending on the extent and temporal profile of the patients neurologic recovery.
机译:研究设计:系统审查,观察数据的省略空调分析。目的:提出任何紧急外科减压的建议表明是在没有骨折或不稳定性的情况下表明在患有急性中央脐带损伤的患者中提高神经系统恢复的最佳治疗。背景数据摘要:目前没有关于急性创伤中央帘线综合征的解压缩的作用和时序的标准。在没有脊柱柱不稳定的TCC的设置中,存在很大的争议。方法:我们根据以下问题进行了彻底的文献搜索:“在急性中央绳索综合征中迫切(从伤害24小时内24小时内24小时内)的作用,无骨折或不稳定地增强神经系统恢复?”从多中心STSG观察数据库分析包括患者人口统计学,损伤机制,损伤机制,神经系统和手术治疗的数据。衡量结果包括亚洲运动得分,亚洲等级,功能独立措施(FIM)得分,SF-36,括约肌扰动和外流地位。在入场,排放,6个月和1年内记录措施。结果:在12个月的随访中,早期手术导致6.31点的总电机得分提高比晚期手术小组更高,P = 0.0358。在6个月的随访中,早期手术导致亚洲等级的改善机会比晚期手术更高,差价率= 3.39,而在12个月的后续前期手术中导致亚洲成绩的改善机会更高,赔率比为2.81。在24小时内运营的患者有7.79岁,在6个月随访时,FIM总得分比晚期患者更具改善,P = 0.0474。结论:对观察数据集的相关和审查审查后专家的共识得出结论认为,由于发育颈椎管狭窄,持续脊髓压缩患者是合理和安全的患者早期手术减压,可应合和安全。没有骨折或不稳定。缺乏严重缺陷(亚洲= D)的人可以在稍后的患者的神经系统恢复的程度和时间概况进行初步观察,潜在的初步观察。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号