首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Data value and care value in the practice of health systems: A case study in Uganda
【24h】

Data value and care value in the practice of health systems: A case study in Uganda

机译:卫生系统实践中的数据价值和关怀价值:乌干达的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In anthropology, interest in how values are created, maintained and changed has been reinvigorated. In this case study, we draw on this literature to interrogate concerns about the relationship between data collection and the delivery of patient care within global health. We followed a pilot study conducted in Kayunga, Uganda that aimed to improve the collection of health systems data in five public health centres. We undertook ethnographic research from July 2015 to September 2016 in health centres, at project workshops, meetings and training sessions. This included three months of observations by three fieldworkers; in-depth interviews with health workers (n = 15) and stakeholders (n = 5); and six focus group discussions with health workers. We observed that measurement, calculation and narrative practices could be assigned care-value or data-value and that the attempt to improve data collection within health facilities transferred 'data-value' into health centres with little consideration among project staff for its impact on care. We document acts of acquiescence and resistance to data-value by health workers. We also describe the rare moments when senior health workers reconciled these two forms of value, and care-value and data-value were enacted simultaneously. In contrast to many anthropological accounts, our analysis suggests that data-value and care-value are not necessarily conflicting. Actors seeking to make changes in health systems must, however, take into account local forms of value and devise health systems interventions that reinforce and enrich existing ethically driven practice.
机译:在人类学中,对如何创建价值,维护和更改的兴趣已被重新维持。在这种情况下,我们借鉴了这种文献,询问了对数据收集之间关系的担忧,并在全球健康中提供患者护理。我们遵循在乌干达凯公中进行的试点研究,旨在改善五个公共卫生中心的卫生系​​统数据收集。我们于2015年7月至2016年9月在卫生中心,在项目讲习班,会议和培训课程中进行了民族志研究。这包括三个月的三个月的三个月的观察;与卫生工作者的深入访谈(N = 15)和利益相关者(n = 5);和六个焦点小组与卫生工作者讨论。我们观察到,可以分配计量,计算和叙事实践,可以分配护理价值或数据价值,并试图改善卫生设施中的数据收集的数据收集转移到健康中心的“数据价值”,并在项目工作人员对护理的影响几乎没有考虑。我们通过卫生工作者记录默许和抵抗数据价值的行为。当资深卫生工作者协调这两种形式的价值时,我们也描述了罕见的时刻,并同时制定了关怀和数据价值。与许多人类学账户相比,我们的分析表明数据价值和关怀值不一定是冲突的。然而,寻求对卫生系统进行变化的演员必须考虑到当地的价值形式和制定卫生系统的干预,这些干预措施加强和丰富了现有的道德驱动的实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号