...
首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >The role of health insurance in explaining immigrant versus non-immigrant disparities in access to health care: comparing the United States to Canada.
【24h】

The role of health insurance in explaining immigrant versus non-immigrant disparities in access to health care: comparing the United States to Canada.

机译:健康保险在解释移民与卫生保健方面的非移民差异的作用:将美国与加拿大进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Using a cross-national comparative approach, we examined the influence of health insurance on U.S. immigrant versus non-immigrant disparities in access to primary health care. With data from the 2002/2003 Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health, we gathered evidence using three approaches: 1) we compared health care access among insured and uninsured immigrants and non-immigrants within the U.S.; 2) we contrasted these results with health care access disparities between immigrants and non-immigrants in Canada, a country with universal health care; and 3) we conducted a novel direct comparison of health care access among insured and uninsured U.S. immigrants with Canadian immigrants (all of whom are insured). Outcomes investigated were self-reported unmet medical needs and lack of a regular doctor. Logistic regression models controlled for age, sex, nonwhite status, marital status, education, employment, and self-rated health. In the U.S., odds of unmet medical needs of insured immigrants were similar to those of insured non-immigrants but far greater for uninsured immigrants. The effect of health insurance was even more striking for lack of regular doctor. Within Canada, disparities between immigrants and non-immigrants were similar in magnitude to disparities seen among insured Americans. For both outcomes, direct comparisons of U.S. and Canada revealed significant differences between uninsured American immigrants and Canadian immigrants, but not between insured Americans and Canadians, stratified by nativity. Findings suggest health care insurance is a critical cause of differences between immigrants and non-immigrants in access to primary care, lending robust support for the expansion of health insurance coverage in the U.S. This study also highlights the usefulness of cross-national comparisons for establishing alternative counterfactuals in studies of disparities in health and health care.
机译:使用跨国比较方法,我们研究了健康保险对美国移民的影响与初级医疗保健的非移民差异。根据2002/2003年度加拿大/美国卫生调查的数据,我们采用了三种方法收集了证据:1)我们比较了保险和未经保险的移民和美国内部非移民之间的医疗保健获取。 2)我们将这些结果与加拿大移民和非移民之间的医疗保健获取差异鲜明对比,该国有普遍保健; 3)我们进行了一部小说直接比较保险和未保险的美国移民与加拿大移民(所有人被保险人)的卫生保健访问。调查的结果是自我报告的未满足医疗需求和缺乏常规医生。逻辑回归模型控制年龄,性别,非行为地位,婚姻状况,教育,就业和自我评价的健康。在美国,未保险移民的未满足医疗需求的赔率与被保险人的非移民的可能性相似,但对于未经保险的移民而言远远大。健康保险的效果对于缺乏常规医生甚至更加引人注目。在加拿大境内,移民与非移民之间的差异幅度相似于被保险人的美国人之间看到的差异。对于两种成果来说,美国和加拿大的直接比较揭示了无保险的美国移民和加拿大移民之间的显着差异,但在被保险人和加拿大人之间而不是由诞生分类。调查结果表明医疗保险是移民和非移民在获取初级保健方面的差异,对美国健康保险的扩张贷款支持的危急原因本研究还凸显了跨国比较建立替代方案的有用性健康保健差距研究的反事实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号