首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Contested moral landscapes: Negotiating breastfeeding stigma in breastmilk sharing, nighttime breastfeeding, and long-term breastfeeding in the US and the UK
【24h】

Contested moral landscapes: Negotiating breastfeeding stigma in breastmilk sharing, nighttime breastfeeding, and long-term breastfeeding in the US and the UK

机译:有争议的道德景观:在美国和英国谈判母乳喂养,夜间母乳喂养和长期母乳喂养的母乳喂养耻辱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent public health breastfeeding promotion efforts have galvanized media debates about breastfeeding in wealthy, Euro-American settings. A growing body of research demonstrates that while breastfeeding is increasingly viewed as important for health, mothers continue to face significant structural and cultural barriers. Concerns have been raised about the moralizing aspects of breastfeeding promotion and its detrimental effects on those who do not breastfeed. Far less, however, is known about the moral experiences of those who pursue breastfeeding. This study draws together research on breastmilk sharing (2012-2016) and nighttime breastfeeding from the U.S. (2006-2009), and long-term breastfeeding from the U.K. (2008-2009) from three ethnographic projects to address this gap. Comparative analysis of these cases reveals that while breastfeeding is considered ideal infant nutrition, aspects of its practice continue to evoke physical and moral danger, even when these practices are implemented to facilitate breastfeeding. Breastmilk sharing to maintain exclusive breastmilk feeding, nighttime breastfeeding and bedsharing to facilitate breastfeeding, and breastfeeding beyond the accepted duration are considered unnecessary, unhealthy, harmful or even deadly. The sexual connotations of breastfeeding enhance the morally threatening qualities of these practices. The cessation of these "problematic" breastfeeding practices and their replacement with formula-feeding or other foods is viewed as a way to restore the normative social and moral order. Mothers manage the stigmatization of these breastfeeding practices through secrecy and avoidance of health professionals and others who might judge them, often leading to social isolation. Our findings highlight the divide between perceptions of the ideal of breastfeeding and its actual practice and point to the contested moral status of breastfeeding in the U.S. and the U.K. Further comparative ethnographic research is needed to illuminate the lived social and moral experiences of breastfeeding, and inform initiatives to normalize and support its practice without stigmatizing parents who do not breastfeed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:最近的公共卫生母乳喂养促销努力有镀锌媒体关于富裕,欧美环境的母乳喂养。越来越多的研究表明,虽然母乳喂养越来越重要,但母亲继续面临着显着的结构和文化障碍。对母乳喂养促进的道德方面以及对那些不母乳喂养的人的不利影响,已经提出了担忧。然而,关于追求母乳喂养的人的道德经历,越来越少。本研究借鉴了美国(2006-2009)的母乳共享(2012-2016)和夜间母乳喂养的研究,以及从U.K.(2008-2009)的长期母乳喂养,从三个民族造影项目中解决了这个差距。对比分析这些病例显示,虽然母乳喂养被认为是理想的婴儿营养,但即使在实施这些实践以促进母乳喂养时,其实践的各个方面也在继续唤起身体和道德危险。母乳共享以维持独家母乳喂养,夜间母乳喂养和卧室,以促进母乳喂养,以及超越所接受的持续时间的母乳喂养被认为是不必要的,不健康,有害甚至致命的。母乳喂养的性内涵提升了这些做法的道德威胁性质。将这些“有问题”母乳喂养实践及其用配方喂养或其他食物的替代的停止被视为恢复规范性社会和道德秩序的一种方式。母亲通过保密和避免卫生专业人士和可能判断他们的其他人来管理这些母乳喂养行为的侮辱,往往导致社会孤立。我们的研究结果强调了对母乳喂养理想的看法之间的鸿沟及其实际实践,并指出了美国母乳喂养的有争议的道德地位,而英国需要进一步的比较民族图,以照亮母乳喂养的生活社会和道德经历,并告知在没有羞辱没有母乳喂养的父母的情况下,正常化和支持其实践的举措。 (c)2016 Elsevier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号