首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Contested moral landscapes: Negotiating breastfeeding stigma in breastmilk sharing, nighttime breastfeeding, and long-term breastfeeding in the US and the UK
【24h】

Contested moral landscapes: Negotiating breastfeeding stigma in breastmilk sharing, nighttime breastfeeding, and long-term breastfeeding in the US and the UK

机译:有争议的道德风光:在美国和英国,就母乳共享,夜间母乳喂养和长期母乳喂养的谈判中对母乳喂养的污名进行谈判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent public health breastfeeding promotion efforts have galvanized media debates about breastfeeding in wealthy, Euro-American settings. A growing body of research demonstrates that while breastfeeding is increasingly viewed as important for health, mothers continue to face significant structural and cultural barriers. Concerns have been raised about the moralizing aspects of breastfeeding promotion and its detrimental effects on those who do not breastfeed. Far less, however, is known about the moral experiences of those who pursue breastfeeding. This study draws together research on breastmilk sharing (2012-2016) and nighttime breastfeeding from the U.S. (2006-2009), and long-term breastfeeding from the U.K. (2008-2009) from three ethnographic projects to address this gap. Comparative analysis of these cases reveals that while breastfeeding is considered ideal infant nutrition, aspects of its practice continue to evoke physical and moral danger, even when these practices are implemented to facilitate breastfeeding. Breastmilk sharing to maintain exclusive breastmilk feeding, nighttime breastfeeding and bedsharing to facilitate breastfeeding, and breastfeeding beyond the accepted duration are considered unnecessary, unhealthy, harmful or even deadly. The sexual connotations of breastfeeding enhance the morally threatening qualities of these practices. The cessation of these "problematic" breastfeeding practices and their replacement with formula-feeding or other foods is viewed as a way to restore the normative social and moral order. Mothers manage the stigmatization of these breastfeeding practices through secrecy and avoidance of health professionals and others who might judge them, often leading to social isolation. Our findings highlight the divide between perceptions of the ideal of breastfeeding and its actual practice and point to the contested moral status of breastfeeding in the U.S. and the U.K. Further comparative ethnographic research is needed to illuminate the lived social and moral experiences of breastfeeding, and inform initiatives to normalize and support its practice without stigmatizing parents who do not breastfeed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:最近的公共卫生母乳喂养促进工作激起了媒体关于富裕的欧美地区母乳喂养的辩论。越来越多的研究表明,尽管母乳喂养对健康的重要性日益提高,但母亲仍然面临着重大的结构和文化障碍。人们对促进母乳喂养的道德方面及其对不母乳喂养的人的有害影响表示关注。但是,对于那些追求母乳喂养的人的道德经历知之甚少。这项研究汇总了三个人种学项目对美国母乳共享(2012-2016)和美国夜间哺乳(2006-2009)以及英国长期母乳喂养(2008-2009)的研究,以弥补这一差距。对这些病例的比较分析表明,尽管母乳喂养被认为是理想的婴儿营养,但即使实施这些措施以促进母乳喂养,其实践的各个方面仍在继续唤起身体和道德上的危险。共享母乳以维持独家母乳喂养,夜间母乳喂养和床褥共享以促进母乳喂养,以及超出可接受的持续时间的母乳喂养被认为是不必要,不健康,有害甚至致命的。母乳喂养的性含义增强了这些做法的道德威胁性。停止这些“有问题的”母乳喂养做法,并用配方奶或其他食品代替,被视为恢复规范的社会和道德秩序的一种方式。母亲们通过保密,避免卫生专业人员和其他可能会做出判断的人来避免对这些母乳喂养方式的污名化,这常常导致社会隔离。我们的发现凸显了对母乳喂养的理想认识与实际实践之间的鸿沟,并指出了在美国和英国存在争议的母乳喂养的道德状况。需要进一步的人种学比较研究来阐明母乳喂养的现实社会和道德经验,并为他们提供帮助。旨在规范和支持其做法的倡议,而不会给没有母乳喂养的父母带来耻辱。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号